From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D8E7C07E99 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 14:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47F0D613B5 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 14:23:48 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 47F0D613B5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=M2VvZlv1h/svwb4z2QY1DNn4fV0Sk05cW9UhlZKWZ/Q=; b=2xCBwt3Vt9YoaC Q4ChPpGMqDYD+yZnUk1/a/OJX7wia73kQtAP98uomN25Mwo0gCr6UdSaG8ODnAyUiWTaAxduxL4Wx Fg0YnyydpmGB27qvJnoxuvrVleZlRBfUjGL1ljPoFi6isC1BmJiY+4H3jEbyPb7bVW15lo4v1oJqY 6WvsN9WiIji9nPaAVkFvUkSgEGIgqqInn0RdGK/5naoOTamwqlNkvBrm+VaZS20eHS+AiPr9pMlkR pQTi5BMr5XG+5iXbYCijxWP9EJWqb4/UiqZSCV0KRE1j7d9FLqzepZYymZv5zo04DOt+D9NyXyero V69C61lj5fPPr8qN50Og==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m1rOD-001uyo-Al; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 14:22:01 +0000 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m1rO9-001uy0-AZ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 14:21:59 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1625840515; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=R80jkwSRBMdXMIX0M3ux6M8QaLP+0xDfTy88OLoP8qM=; b=feOvNtOh1zykfjLq7ZWJJuuUgCyIbYxgxsO/YMg6Siv47/x8gTl8l9XU2PUJfs5l6nRFou yIoloi2j83wbatGgx0YTd6VOCpslhKEVUJTI1vwcslzTpwD+aCdByKek5aTL9arhQbUWqf gJyZmeYI/ziO232NPY+ognMQ/+z2B7c= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-604-Mi1YBWmwOS2HtCIMAe8qEg-1; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 10:21:54 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Mi1YBWmwOS2HtCIMAe8qEg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C834B343CD; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 14:21:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from T590 (ovpn-12-94.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.94]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE32F60BD8; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 14:21:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 22:21:39 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: "Russell King (Oracle)" Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [bug report] iommu_dma_unmap_sg() is very slow then running IO from remote numa node Message-ID: References: <20210709101614.GZ22278@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210709101614.GZ22278@shell.armlinux.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210709_072157_504668_4630236A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.79 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 11:16:14AM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 04:38:09PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > I observed that NVMe performance is very bad when running fio on one > > CPU(aarch64) in remote numa node compared with the nvme pci numa node. > > Have you checked the effect of running a memory-heavy process using > memory from node 1 while being executed by CPUs in node 0? 1) aarch64 [root@ampere-mtjade-04 ~]# taskset -c 0 numactl -m 0 perf bench mem memcpy -s 4GB -f default # Running 'mem/memcpy' benchmark: # function 'default' (Default memcpy() provided by glibc) # Copying 4GB bytes ... 11.511752 GB/sec [root@ampere-mtjade-04 ~]# taskset -c 0 numactl -m 1 perf bench mem memcpy -s 4GB -f default # Running 'mem/memcpy' benchmark: # function 'default' (Default memcpy() provided by glibc) # Copying 4GB bytes ... 3.084333 GB/sec 2) x86_64[1] [root@hp-dl380g10-01 mingl]# taskset -c 0 numactl -m 0 perf bench mem memcpy -s 4GB -f default # Running 'mem/memcpy' benchmark: # function 'default' (Default memcpy() provided by glibc) # Copying 4GB bytes ... 4.193927 GB/sec [root@hp-dl380g10-01 mingl]# taskset -c 0 numactl -m 1 perf bench mem memcpy -s 4GB -f default # Running 'mem/memcpy' benchmark: # function 'default' (Default memcpy() provided by glibc) # Copying 4GB bytes ... 3.553392 GB/sec [1] on this x86_64 machine, IOPS can reach 680K in same fio nvme test Thanks, Ming _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel