From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95539C12002 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 08:24:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FC4B6120C for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 08:24:32 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5FC4B6120C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=xUdO2C9XLlspOgR7boWDeYJVmja1s8NR3L/fxvO+GxQ=; b=oT4UfI6/7MhKs6 8vP4dO9IQFJrF2Qc18mUlFhSmcuEXfqEx/yv1/fcK7ln0pmksla6PO8oKsSgw16sVQaOmcuLjxKK6 JXiQd8lE0wQUM7eHi624iUOcLsh0lFOJdCB490KTH0qbmIZSE6BPlB/+O4mwCWz8QcZYDhhCLKAWt TQYF4hYsDsY79O/3asnQcERmOGKN00t8Y4do01gvL/7n/opQsrW7S8zZTa8Ke0pnwu64fcmuAeQ5z T+VG7DXie7g6vUPoHYKFkGskKyz1A4TLMJi7koGlJEm8FxzP+hbRgjuhGAcK0fnKgzpENOyNs6gUd kz3VIZaG95YhE5rq1DMA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m67VJ-00Et0V-SQ; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 08:22:58 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m67VF-00Esza-VK for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 08:22:55 +0000 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2051860725; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 08:22:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1626855773; bh=3PWNZrY7Out6Ln+JN77opOhAxUWkjAGCCcV/67Adxew=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=qI5dNiRdcZW41C4zH5DsiCCa1bfUyApXrNylhYbUKKn/hU05I1/GzHSh/PkFHMnQs zE7ISA/7UOy3NL4lQepk+1yOzqqo6RULs2L2s9KJgOaMG1lg7Yfe+r9fXFM6g/fuIL /wLGIK4EGDHh7xkBqrT3af/QIND4/0bsNbqNtuqg= Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 10:22:51 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Ojaswin Mujoo Cc: Stefan Wahren , nsaenz@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, phil@raspberrypi.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] staging: vchiq: Combine vchiq platform code into single file Message-ID: References: <20210711112821.GA5049@ojas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210711112821.GA5049@ojas> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210721_012254_090077_F3F14CD1 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 30.08 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 04:58:21PM +0530, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote: > On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 12:49:35PM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote: > > Am 04.07.21 um 17:59 schrieb Ojaswin Mujoo: > > > Combine the vchiq platform initialization code into a single file by > > > merging vchiq_2835_arm.c into vchiq_arm.c > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo > > > --- > > > drivers/staging/vc04_services/Makefile | 1 - > > > .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_2835_arm.c | 564 ------------------ > > > .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 549 +++++++++++++++++ > > > 3 files changed, 549 insertions(+), 565 deletions(-) > > > delete mode 100644 drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_2835_arm.c > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/Makefile b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/Makefile > > > index 0a04338fc962..1fd191e2e2a5 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/Makefile > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/Makefile > > > @@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BCM2835_VCHIQ) += vchiq.o > > > vchiq-objs := \ > > > interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.o \ > > > interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.o \ > > > - interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_2835_arm.o \ > > > interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_debugfs.o \ > > > interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_connected.o \ > > > > > ... > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c > > > index 0f2de571eba7..9057d01ffd48 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c > > > @@ -25,15 +25,32 @@ > > > #include > > > #include > > > #include > > > +#include > > > +#include > > > +#include > > > #include > > > > > > #include "vchiq_core.h" > > > #include "vchiq_ioctl.h" > > > #include "vchiq_arm.h" > > > #include "vchiq_debugfs.h" > > > +#include "vchiq_connected.h" > > > +#include "vchiq_pagelist.h" > > > > > > #define DEVICE_NAME "vchiq" > > > > > > +#define TOTAL_SLOTS (VCHIQ_SLOT_ZERO_SLOTS + 2 * 32) > > > + > > > +#define MAX_FRAGMENTS (VCHIQ_NUM_CURRENT_BULKS * 2) > > > + > > > +#define VCHIQ_PLATFORM_FRAGMENTS_OFFSET_IDX 0 > > > +#define VCHIQ_PLATFORM_FRAGMENTS_COUNT_IDX 1 > > > + > > > +#define BELL0 0x00 > > > +#define BELL2 0x08 > > > + > > > +#define ARM_DS_ACTIVE BIT(2) > > > + > > > /* Override the default prefix, which would be vchiq_arm (from the filename) */ > > > #undef MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX > > > #define MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX DEVICE_NAME "." > > > @@ -59,10 +76,542 @@ static struct vchiq_drvdata bcm2836_drvdata = { > > > .cache_line_size = 64, > > > }; > > > > > > +struct vchiq_2835_state { > > > + int inited; > > > + struct vchiq_arm_state arm_state; > > > +}; > > > + > > > +struct vchiq_pagelist_info { > > > + struct pagelist *pagelist; > > > + size_t pagelist_buffer_size; > > > + dma_addr_t dma_addr; > > > + enum dma_data_direction dma_dir; > > > + unsigned int num_pages; > > > + unsigned int pages_need_release; > > > + struct page **pages; > > > + struct scatterlist *scatterlist; > > > + unsigned int scatterlist_mapped; > > > +}; > > > + > > > +static void __iomem *g_regs; > > > +/* This value is the size of the L2 cache lines as understood by the > > > + * VPU firmware, which determines the required alignment of the > > > + * offsets/sizes in pagelists. > > > + * > > > + * Modern VPU firmware looks for a DT "cache-line-size" property in > > > + * the VCHIQ node and will overwrite it with the actual L2 cache size, > > > + * which the kernel must then respect. That property was rejected > > > + * upstream, so we have to use the VPU firmware's compatibility value > > > + * of 32. > > > + */ > > > +static unsigned int g_cache_line_size = 32; > > > +static unsigned int g_fragments_size; > > > +static char *g_fragments_base; > > > +static char *g_free_fragments; > > > +static struct semaphore g_free_fragments_sema; > > > +static struct device *g_dev; > > > + > > > +static DEFINE_SEMAPHORE(g_free_fragments_mutex); > > > + > > > +static irqreturn_t > > > +vchiq_doorbell_irq(int irq, void *dev_id); > > > + > > > +static struct vchiq_pagelist_info * > > > +create_pagelist(char *buf, char __user *ubuf, size_t count, unsigned short type); > > > + > > > +static void > > > +free_pagelist(struct vchiq_pagelist_info *pagelistinfo, > > > + int actual); > > > > please no forward declarations of these 3 functions. Put them into the > > right order instead ... > > > > Since this patch is independent from the other ones from the series, > > maybe Greg can merg the rest of the series. > > > > > > > > Hello Stefan, > > Thanks for the review. As for the forward declerations, sure I can fix > these 3 functions and send an independent patch for this. Please fix up and resend the whole series properly so that I can apply them that way. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel