From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9FBC432BE for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 06:55:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ABE060C3E for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 06:55:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 3ABE060C3E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=58BtP9BJqKz15Y1xXv8fiOIZs+m72tIO8ODeCHY17kI=; b=v0TCeRu/wDLNIo EY6DA6YYE4HWTZhg4rW8s44tUNIHh0/ZfFWEaqMmh37Px8+C4QUH2475i8MtdqnoKSFE5COvgo9QL tbYH6xYjTeNL8Dv1xKTyiZIy4tykYvTj+a4MTGPqwJcomil6xfEZQY8rrHWeUnB5cwy80lzTFJR1S tnsnwuZA2OgdWoMrmnWVr4O0lsyz3ggTcyYLL79rq9AQ6fmFXGoxd0g0S5fbMaJz4+WxJdbdNG81m Iijocby5yF7Esm4VVsUHVbgumOdVXTDvtYijuxwwmf3BktFMfkniPSYtolH5mThK9vFalG5rdfbML F0Fkg07vTYQZ9bO5p5vQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mLgar-008kNl-VF; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 06:53:02 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mLgal-008kMK-3G; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 06:52:59 +0000 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E9F3F60C3E; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 06:52:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1630565573; bh=Tv65ZWVxn/+fMQglBkEG2bViohQl6I7pMD5PRiDb/OY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=zkCACKOHW+/1wPgjnLO9CWoKRkNWPwCBuFETWGmgqgHMfYAokbL91qIXIRaeMLZX6 QHK7uMeRtgBzHAe1Mha1kFZ9Dr8aV2+aPFvT5+fax8HqXBuClP644379CI4V9H4WmQ nY2AnuWhX1xuIsKoBemem4jhbTuFu8wiLukApgr0= Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 08:52:45 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Cai Huoqing Cc: rafael@kernel.org, patrice.chotard@foss.st.com, mchehab@kernel.org, ryder.lee@mediatek.com, jianjun.wang@mediatek.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, robh@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, bhelgaas@google.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] driver core: platform: Add the helper function devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource_byname() Message-ID: References: <20210902063702.32066-1-caihuoqing@baidu.com> <20210902063702.32066-2-caihuoqing@baidu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210902063702.32066-2-caihuoqing@baidu.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210901_235255_225280_84A98502 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.10 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 02:37:00PM +0800, Cai Huoqing wrote: > Since provide the helper function devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname() > which is wrap platform_get_resource_byname() and devm_ioremap_resource(). > But sometimes, many drivers still need to use the resource variables > obtained by platform_get_resource(). In these cases, provide this helper > function devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource_byname(). > > Signed-off-by: Cai Huoqing > --- > v1->v2: Resend this patch as part of a patch series that uses > the new function. > > drivers/base/platform.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > include/linux/platform_device.h | 3 +++ > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c > index 652531f67135..34bb581338d9 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/platform.c > +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c > @@ -124,6 +124,31 @@ void __iomem *devm_platform_ioremap_resource(struct platform_device *pdev, > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_platform_ioremap_resource); > > +/** > + * devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource_byname - call devm_ioremap_resource() for a > + * platform device and get resource > + * > + * @pdev: platform device to use both for memory resource lookup as well as > + * resource management > + * @name: name of the resource > + * @res: optional output parameter to store a pointer to the obtained resource. > + * > + * Return: a pointer to the remapped memory or an ERR_PTR() encoded error code > + * on failure. > + */ > +void __iomem * > +devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource_byname(struct platform_device *pdev, > + const char *name, struct resource **res) > +{ > + struct resource *r; > + > + r = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, name); > + if (res) > + *res = r; You forgot to check the return value of this call :( Which means you did not test this? Why not? But step back, _WHY_ is this needed at all? How deep are we going to get with the "devm_platform_get_and_do_this_and_that_and_that" type functions here? You show 2 users of this call, and they save what, 1-2 lines of code here? What is the real need for this? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel