From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
David Brazdil <dbrazdil@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/16] KVM: arm64: pkvm: Unshare guest structs during teardown
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 15:03:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YW1+mQ6Bn2HXwl34@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YW1NLb9Pn9NyEYZF@google.com>
On Monday 18 Oct 2021 at 11:32:13 (+0100), Quentin Perret wrote:
> Another option is to take a refcount on 'current' from
> kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp() before sharing thread-specific structs with
> the hyp and release the refcount of the previous task after unsharing.
> But that means we'll have to also drop the refcount when the vcpu
> gets destroyed, as well as explicitly unshare at that point. Shouldn't
> be too bad I think. Thoughts?
Something like the below seems to work OK on my setup, including
SIGKILL'ing the guest and such. How much do you hate it?
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index f8be56d5342b..50598d704c71 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
struct thread_info *host_thread_info; /* hyp VA */
struct user_fpsimd_state *host_fpsimd_state; /* hyp VA */
+ struct task_struct *parent_task;
struct {
/* {Break,watch}point registers */
@@ -738,6 +739,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_arch_vcpu_ctxsync_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_arch_vcpu_put_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+void kvm_vcpu_unshare_task_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
static inline bool kvm_pmu_counter_deferred(struct perf_event_attr *attr)
{
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
index 2fe1128d9f3d..27afeebbe1cb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
@@ -15,6 +15,22 @@
#include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
#include <asm/sysreg.h>
+void kvm_vcpu_unshare_task_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct task_struct *p = vcpu->arch.parent_task;
+ struct user_fpsimd_state *fpsimd;
+ struct thread_info *ti;
+
+ if (!static_branch_likely(&kvm_protected_mode_initialized) || !p)
+ return;
+
+ ti = &p->thread_info;
+ kvm_unshare_hyp(ti, ti + 1);
+ fpsimd = &p->thread.uw.fpsimd_state;
+ kvm_unshare_hyp(fpsimd, fpsimd + 1);
+ put_task_struct(p);
+}
+
/*
* Called on entry to KVM_RUN unless this vcpu previously ran at least
* once and the most recent prior KVM_RUN for this vcpu was called from
@@ -31,6 +47,8 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
struct thread_info *ti = ¤t->thread_info;
struct user_fpsimd_state *fpsimd = ¤t->thread.uw.fpsimd_state;
+ kvm_vcpu_unshare_task_fp(vcpu);
+
/*
* Make sure the host task thread flags and fpsimd state are
* visible to hyp:
@@ -45,6 +63,17 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
vcpu->arch.host_thread_info = kern_hyp_va(ti);
vcpu->arch.host_fpsimd_state = kern_hyp_va(fpsimd);
+
+ /*
+ * We need to keep current's task_struct pinned until its data has been
+ * unshared with the hypervisor to make sure it is not re-used by the
+ * kernel and donated to someone else while already shared -- see
+ * kvm_vcpu_unshare_task_fp() for the matching put_task_struct().
+ */
+ if (static_branch_likely(&kvm_protected_mode_initialized)) {
+ get_task_struct(current);
+ vcpu->arch.parent_task = current;
+ }
error:
return ret;
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
index 5ce36b0a3343..c2a2cd7d5748 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
@@ -141,7 +141,13 @@ bool kvm_arm_vcpu_is_finalized(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
void kvm_arm_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- kfree(vcpu->arch.sve_state);
+ void *sve_state = vcpu->arch.sve_state;
+
+ kvm_vcpu_unshare_task_fp(vcpu);
+ kvm_unshare_hyp(vcpu, vcpu + 1);
+ if (sve_state && vcpu->arch.has_run_once)
+ kvm_unshare_hyp(sve_state, sve_state + vcpu_sve_state_size(vcpu));
+ kfree(sve_state);
}
static void kvm_vcpu_reset_sve(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-18 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-13 15:58 [PATCH 00/16] KVM: arm64: Implement unshare hypercall for pkvm Quentin Perret
2021-10-13 15:58 ` [PATCH 01/16] KVM: arm64: Introduce do_share() helper for memory sharing between components Quentin Perret
2021-10-15 15:11 ` Andrew Walbran
2021-10-19 10:37 ` Quentin Perret
2021-10-13 15:58 ` [PATCH 02/16] KVM: arm64: Implement __pkvm_host_share_hyp() using do_share() Quentin Perret
2021-10-13 15:58 ` [PATCH 03/16] KVM: arm64: Avoid remapping the SVE state in the hyp stage-1 Quentin Perret
2021-10-16 11:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 10:36 ` Quentin Perret
2021-10-13 15:58 ` [PATCH 04/16] KVM: arm64: Introduce kvm_share_hyp() Quentin Perret
2021-10-17 10:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 10:51 ` Quentin Perret
2021-10-13 15:58 ` [PATCH 05/16] KVM: arm64: Accept page ranges in pkvm share hypercall Quentin Perret
2021-10-13 15:58 ` [PATCH 06/16] KVM: arm64: Provide {get,put}_page() stubs for early hyp allocator Quentin Perret
2021-10-13 15:58 ` [PATCH 07/16] KVM: arm64: Refcount hyp stage-1 pgtable pages Quentin Perret
2021-10-13 15:58 ` [PATCH 08/16] KVM: arm64: Fixup hyp stage-1 refcount Quentin Perret
2021-10-13 15:58 ` [PATCH 09/16] KVM: arm64: Hook up ->page_count() for hypervisor stage-1 page-table Quentin Perret
2021-10-13 15:58 ` [PATCH 10/16] KVM: arm64: Implement kvm_pgtable_hyp_unmap() at EL2 Quentin Perret
2021-10-13 15:58 ` [PATCH 11/16] KVM: arm64: Back hyp_vmemmap for all of memory Quentin Perret
2021-10-13 15:58 ` [PATCH 12/16] KVM: arm64: Move hyp refcount helpers to header files Quentin Perret
2021-10-13 15:58 ` [PATCH 13/16] KVM: arm64: Move double-sharing logic into hyp-specific function Quentin Perret
2021-10-13 15:58 ` [PATCH 14/16] KVM: arm64: Refcount shared pages at EL2 Quentin Perret
2021-10-13 15:58 ` [PATCH 15/16] KVM: arm64: pkvm: Introduce an unshare hypercall Quentin Perret
2021-10-13 15:58 ` [PATCH 16/16] KVM: arm64: pkvm: Unshare guest structs during teardown Quentin Perret
2021-10-16 12:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18 10:32 ` Quentin Perret
2021-10-18 14:03 ` Quentin Perret [this message]
2021-10-18 17:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-19 9:40 ` Quentin Perret
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YW1+mQ6Bn2HXwl34@google.com \
--to=qperret@google.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dbrazdil@google.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).