From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE086C433F5 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:32:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B7806052B for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:32:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 9B7806052B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=NvVzpuW4VTWu5Y4MP7T9xk9fYvNu5a6ICjjDdr8ewoQ=; b=XAprbAuZMmGQnV GmKQyk/HjQaROvD5mMH0td2vTDk5FlyRluCFcCV4y6lh2Z57E8Zr4Sqefv41qKsLyJUmFQK6PZ1lE iqw3+JC8mnIkXXYcwNHxTITXdKqfnzrsMi+4K+5iPIWQvuvUKCRNl8iJrngCnTxhG//TS+b9OGamc wWOAcWhphgZphtdLSnrZEIlN6yvE0aanPqLSFyDN7YxgPNLyIA+jEEhchLzSbDqIekKoBsTPpuVBo 0+X7IDPGvdpjUKnrlz79M2qGiSL+9ZXP2dY6dGmgf9ZCSXUYXpZDDDl2mabHIe3oGr/06PvNP6kfo F20xtTB28tL17fTPEhPA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1maKft-00DVyd-Bu; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:30:45 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1maKfo-00DVy8-ST for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:30:42 +0000 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 447F761074; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:30:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 17:30:34 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Hanjun Guo Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Sudeep Holla , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Arnd Bergmann , Marc Zyngier , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: arm64: fix section mismatch warning Message-ID: References: <20210927141921.1760209-1-arnd@kernel.org> <988fa24c-76d2-1c9d-9761-b356efb0576c@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <988fa24c-76d2-1c9d-9761-b356efb0576c@huawei.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211012_093040_963341_63C7B4CE X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.99 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 03:03:29PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > On 2021/9/27 22:19, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > From: Arnd Bergmann > > > > In a gcc-11 randconfig build I came across this warning: > > > > WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x2c084): Section mismatch in reference from the function next_platform_timer() to the variable .init.data:acpi_gtdt_desc > > The function next_platform_timer() references > > the variable __initdata acpi_gtdt_desc. > > This is often because next_platform_timer lacks a __initdata > > annotation or the annotation of acpi_gtdt_desc is wrong. > > > > This happens when next_platform_timer() fails to get inlined > > despite the inline annotation. Adding '__init' solves the issue, > > and it seems best to remove the 'inline' in the process seems > > better anyway. > > There was a patch to fix this issue as well [1], > but not merged yet. > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/7f29a149-e005-f13f-2cc4-a9eb737107e1@huawei.com/T/ I haven't seen this one, it was on linux-acpi list which I don't follow. I usually rely you, Lorenzo or Sudeep to ack such patches and cc Will/me. -- Catalin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel