From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78328C433EF for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 18:40:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EE5B61179 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 18:40:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 3EE5B61179 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=MIwi0ZF/1mdoW9OdqcGHD68vtOhDVHSFLXY+F2uMkpI=; b=j5F0sU3TK0A+FH ociIiQwSj7OYzOZulgNYLOIRdHhsfAm/xnbpZ10EvRgsot6QbnTBb5vhmte5aAcSYrJALRXPfm3bO cI7cBLJ3ou1DcbbVjnDAoZRVbpeFa+z0bKcCHtco8TK0NJw8dGHljuSw3vTJzhp9/r6PUBfAjQtWF FLgtKHVE/tq0BrI7bo+Mc4kF684gsvBPHVz3TaEX0kANsPt6gQroJ5gpXzt5MjUc9d9iRgnvF94mB efSBKf1S4AD0ddZgiP+/by5mZeG4zp55+4SJDmi8vbXWT6KERGPsMOVTT/Q3V5ZgG5tTfdmmPd04Y C7qsqwgGYz51EczKr+mQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mkW0r-0030Lb-7p; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 18:38:29 +0000 Received: from desiato.infradead.org ([2001:8b0:10b:1:d65d:64ff:fe57:4e05]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mkW0p-0030LR-Ho for linux-arm-kernel@bombadil.infradead.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 18:38:27 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=w6en2TS9VFucr6MTK57MquaaP3KtEpQd7lErMapeABw=; b=TNFmVtEPT6gRPBu0bAB2XDKhhP Y11jzmG73/nbOOeRgq2a1LzhEtnMW4BdYBLzhPwfFrlf42hsPDIC7zx8OBLlBPQJw5c99vtoXx1R3 5tRw37y9tiVgCnlQAuCy5OBd1aN4VqHCH0yUbACR7Zjq41TVjfUEAGvajADyv6xdNLCA4oW36g8Bq pGpzsLQJ/z+T7+DYtxSQS+mQZCSIyW9+arim+55EEcb3gvs5Cqho7how28N/NgnYjrVWXQbFjvHs9 ZQzQOCl9WZU0U4LVIXHaPDesUAQzQk8oopIrai2QYl0uF1dySKK3B0Arnn84AfrHsXRGuLU3Rx0yA O+DANq1Q==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mkW0k-00F6wc-GS; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 18:38:22 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 572C030031C; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 19:38:20 +0100 (CET) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 364222082F4DD; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 19:38:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 19:38:20 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Josh Poimboeuf , Jason Baron , Steven Rostedt , Mark Rutland , Kees Cook Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] static_call: get rid of static_call_cond() Message-ID: References: <20211109164549.1724710-1-ardb@kernel.org> <20211109164549.1724710-2-ardb@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211109164549.1724710-2-ardb@kernel.org> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 05:45:43PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > The main reason for the existence of static_call_cond() seems to be that > in theory, when using the generic implementation of static calls, it may > be possible for a compiler to elide the indirect call entirely if the > target is NULL, while still guaranteeing that all side effects of > argument evaluation occur as expected. > > This is rather optimistic: as documented by an existing code comment, > both GCC and Clang (version 10) get this wrong, and even if they ever > get it right, this is far too subtle to rely on for a code path that is > expected to be used only by the 'remaining' architectures once all the > best supported ones implement either the out-of-line or inline optimized > variety of static calls. > > Given that having static_call_cond() clutters up the API, and puts the > burden on the caller to go and check what kind of static call they are > dealing with, let's just get rid of the distinction. No, static_call_cond() signifies the function can be NULL. Both gcc and clang generate correct (but wildly ineffecient) code for this. Without static_call_cond() the generic implementation will do a NULL deref. That is, static_call_cond() does properly encapuslate: func = READ_ONCE(key.func); if (func) func(ARGS); You can't take that out. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel