public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] static_call: deal with unexported keys without cluttering up the API
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 19:49:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YYrCn3mc+EbY+OB/@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211109164549.1724710-3-ardb@kernel.org>

On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 05:45:44PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:

> diff --git a/include/linux/static_call_types.h b/include/linux/static_call_types.h
> index 5a00b8b2cf9f..0bb36294cce7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/static_call_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/static_call_types.h
> @@ -32,15 +32,20 @@
>  struct static_call_site {
>  	s32 addr;
>  	s32 key;
> +	s32 tramp;
>  };

I can't say I'm thrilled at growing this thing, but the cleanup is nice.
Perhaps we can increase alignment on struct static_call_key and instead
frob it in .key still?

>  
>  #define DECLARE_STATIC_CALL(name, func)					\
> -	extern struct static_call_key STATIC_CALL_KEY(name);		\
> +	extern __weak struct static_call_key STATIC_CALL_KEY(name);	\
>  	extern typeof(func) STATIC_CALL_TRAMP(name);

I'm a little bit confused on how this actually works. What does a __weak
extern data symbol do?

A __weak function definition would create a module local instance of the
function barring a strong override.

But what does a __weak extern do?

> diff --git a/kernel/static_call.c b/kernel/static_call.c
> index 43ba0b1e0edb..360cc3cd0fbf 100644
> --- a/kernel/static_call.c
> +++ b/kernel/static_call.c
> @@ -366,18 +366,18 @@ static int static_call_add_module(struct module *mod)
>  		 * means modules are allowed to call static_call_update() on
>  		 * it.
>  		 *
> -		 * Otherwise, the key isn't exported, and 'addr' points to the
> +		 * Otherwise, the key isn't exported, and 'tramp' points to the
>  		 * trampoline so we need to lookup the key.
>  		 *
>  		 * We go through this dance to prevent crazy modules from
>  		 * abusing sensitive static calls.
>  		 */
> -		if (!kernel_text_address(addr))
> +		if (addr)
>  			continue;

This seems to imply that the __weak extern symbol gets resolved to 0 at
module link time.

>  
> -		key = tramp_key_lookup(addr);
> +		key = tramp_key_lookup((unsigned long)offset_to_ptr(&site->tramp));
>  		if (!key) {
> -			pr_warn("Failed to fixup __raw_static_call() usage at: %ps\n",
> +			pr_warn("Failed to fixup static_call() usage at: %ps\n",
>  				static_call_addr(site));
>  			return -EINVAL;

>  		}

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-09 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-09 16:45 [RFC PATCH 0/7] static call updates Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 16:45 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] static_call: get rid of static_call_cond() Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 18:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-09 18:41     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 19:22       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-09 19:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-09 16:45 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] static_call: deal with unexported keys without cluttering up the API Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 18:49   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-11-09 18:53     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 19:41       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-09 16:45 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] static_call: use helper to access non-exported key Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 18:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-09 18:54     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 19:42       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-09 19:45         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 16:45 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] static_call: fix broken static_call_query() for non-exported keys Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 18:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-09 16:45 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] static_call: use non-function types to refer to the trampolines Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 16:45 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] static_call: rename EXPORT_ macros to be more self-explanatory Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 19:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-09 19:03     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 16:45 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] static_call: add generic support for non-exported keys Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YYrCn3mc+EbY+OB/@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox