public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/7] static_call: use helper to access non-exported key
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 20:42:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YYrPJXlyQV5pXPHt@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXEW72y1p-qR+X6EBqM8Rf5+fZnEs2WSSz7b+eU=zvPt6w@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 07:54:23PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 19:53, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 05:45:45PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > @@ -196,13 +190,21 @@ extern long __static_call_return0(void);
> > >       EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(STATIC_CALL_KEY(name));                       \
> > >       EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(STATIC_CALL_TRAMP(name))
> > >
> > > +#define EXPORT_STATIC_CALL_GETKEY_HELPER(name)                               \
> > > +     struct static_call_key *STATIC_CALL_GETKEY(name)(void) {        \
> > > +             BUG_ON(!core_kernel_text(                               \
> > > +                     (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0)));   \
> > > +             return &STATIC_CALL_KEY(name);                          \
> > > +     }                                                               \
> > > +     EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(STATIC_CALL_GETKEY(name))
> >
> > So if I were a nevarious module, I would look up the above symbol from
> > kallsyms (it is exported and easily obtainable) and then simply
> > read the text to discover the key address and we're in business.
> >
> 
> Yeah I realised that. So would you prefer to have a
> .static_call_tramp_key section in each module and look up the keys in
> the module loader?

Think so... do you actually have a need for this?

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-09 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-09 16:45 [RFC PATCH 0/7] static call updates Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 16:45 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] static_call: get rid of static_call_cond() Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 18:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-09 18:41     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 19:22       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-09 19:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-09 16:45 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] static_call: deal with unexported keys without cluttering up the API Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 18:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-09 18:53     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 19:41       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-09 16:45 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] static_call: use helper to access non-exported key Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 18:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-09 18:54     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 19:42       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-11-09 19:45         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 16:45 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] static_call: fix broken static_call_query() for non-exported keys Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 18:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-09 16:45 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] static_call: use non-function types to refer to the trampolines Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 16:45 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] static_call: rename EXPORT_ macros to be more self-explanatory Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 19:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-09 19:03     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-11-09 16:45 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] static_call: add generic support for non-exported keys Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YYrPJXlyQV5pXPHt@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox