Re: [PATCH] Reset task stack state in bringup_cpu()

From: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	<dvyukov@google.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
	<valentin.schneider@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>,
	<woodylin@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reset task stack state in bringup_cpu()
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:31:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZPc7MLxwmd47YYw@qian-HP-Z2-SFF-G5-Workstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211115113310.35693-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>

On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 11:33:10AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> To hot unplug a CPU, the idle task on that CPU calls a few layers of C
> code before finally leaving the kernel. When KASAN is in use, poisoned
> shadow is left around for each of the active stack frames, and when
> shadow call stacks are in use. When shadow call stacks are in use the
> task's SCS SP is left pointing at an arbitrary point within the task's
> shadow call stack.
> 
> When an offlines CPU is hotlpugged back into the kernel, this stale
> state can adversely affect the newly onlined CPU. Stale KASAN shadow can
> alias new stackframes and result in bogus KASAN warnings. A stale SCS SP
> is effectively a memory leak, and prevents a portion of the shadow call
> stack being used. Across a number of hotplug cycles the task's entire
> shadow call stack can become unusable.
> 
> We previously fixed the KASAN issue in commit:
> 
>   e1b77c92981a5222 ("sched/kasan: remove stale KASAN poison after hotplug")
> 
> In commit:
> 
>   f1a0a376ca0c4ef1 ("sched/core: Initialize the idle task with preemption disabled")
> 
> ... we broke both KASAN and SCS, with SCS being fixed up in commit:
> 
>   63acd42c0d4942f7 ("sched/scs: Reset the shadow stack when idle_task_exit")
> 
> ... but as this runs in the context of the idle task being offlines it's
> potentially fragile.
> 
> Fix both of these consistently and more robustly by resetting the SCS SP
> and KASAN shadow immediately before we online a CPU. This ensures the
> idle task always has a consistent state, and removes the need to do so
> when initializing an idle task or when unplugging an idle task.
> 
> I've tested this with both GCC and clang, with reelvant options enabled,
> offlining and online CPUs with:
> 
> | while true; do
> |   for C in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/online; do
> |     echo 0 > $C;
> |     echo 1 > $C;
> |   done
> | done
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211012083521.973587-1-woodylin@google.com/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/YY9ECKyPtDbD9q8q@qian-HP-Z2-SFF-G5-Workstation/
> Fixes: 1a0a376ca0c4ef1 ("sched/core: Initialize the idle task with preemption disabled")
> Reported-by: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Thanks for fixing this quickly, Mark. Triggering an user-after-free in
user namespace but don't think it is related. I'll investigate that
first since it is blocking the rest of regression testing.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel