From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624F5C433EF for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 17:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3022C61A03 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 17:22:29 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 3022C61A03 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=faJL8mtPaAev52UpO7s1I7rSYqSj1OTJE3hNPFbHwNQ=; b=O6KxsG9oWIwH0e wYTnTL+/QuFghirGvDBNRQgZVWO1O9F2DGect0oIfcQWmpiIbjJNXrZTBhscNYMZWSsoZ0bc2pWOF Te1y2PnKxVtPWUv1bOIyeWDVyPLI50RR6FMK8ayV9sSV94z/2ChlOZhfBQXCGPwbsONN+qgtUx+66 HNOVMmVcdrPK24pJiY3gdk5z0peVPwzT4ar+g0rX19R14cM7r7rk3wz9g+DTSG4//lafTaK82eHG4 Or0U/a/BNBsI0ESTjkex2eiKkj7fVl+eSqcUfraXzUnDwIA8Q0OvIq+lhr5dGPQJ8WlNdlGgoNo4T OYnCK3o/q5KH8TH7HvJg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mn28j-002RSa-3h; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 17:21:01 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mn28f-002RSH-FM for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 17:20:58 +0000 Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id g14so27493616edb.8 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:20:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Y7/ymhGPjLSJyJ+YNwQEo5utnlZQVkYRG4UA4vbBNwE=; b=Z6E7Zuy9PVFwXGePFb9KxhGg+daLtMwLGjckBQ7b2vySbEEd1DJ0lUYC6pLSnm7zSy kXaweByb8FcJBWyKrE0jB3m51ljQqHMdGCk7ZkQqVUt+khzHBmkhOhYe1GeFo2W6Nsso vazqnh/kK2bGZ911xdksNeaXzz4+eRLENNElhVi8yJ2J5xEZwstLoQikqgkyc4PHcOjs XhCdev6ycGAfTq4vNwHJOk+sXDN1s+oVbuSatxxkOwnnFrHnGr8o0dVBJWdYc+XtttBs NI6LHtNi5BKXpHXhsMPWOn1q/Bomz5sn42rCzH5vIJIZ7JDKmxvWD/Nouai7ne9MAmAZ Va+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Y7/ymhGPjLSJyJ+YNwQEo5utnlZQVkYRG4UA4vbBNwE=; b=xslgtLZBvtWcjAFAcGwkkcGxV8mfGZeYZhGX+3ZbvQQyuysVGeU/Oj4YFdawfgVDgB bKPTX0Cr0vljRhqW1zpJcsafrLp4slI5ccOQ4qA3E5IWfuVq+9IhRjZFkfmzZTKumDHz iDTGQnmWlnvgnG3DLVYBazxYIH3zYRdMpmyjRiiQpkl3uPF+BFFoxyms4P0Up+XAg+em jRAj08AJqr7GcIE7NI/SVUjSGGvVP5fZjBzZdVtzInrGFrOV3Oe+KmTicxXmAxKBfzSi ITbyp/QQBRRFJnpvohnuvQFGLUVgrn1LkQuWnF4T+QFGl3HwTjVQwfoeyG6viE3x2Jky hkmg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533b7bUdxlNBSQUygkpss3gKICUlZweORw3LLLa8PovaCo0eDXIP BIS9YAmeLEOxTq8t2muOFd/x0g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJysrk4hn2MXFU1z+7fNFOPzdwH3NRQbppL+rDRVzDdxxgEucQ2rht9F4+xHJqZt9Jy1xcVSqg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:629b:: with SMTP id nd27mr12055773ejc.24.1637083255412; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:20:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from myrica (cpc92880-cmbg19-2-0-cust679.5-4.cable.virginm.net. [82.27.106.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j3sm8344871ejo.2.2021.11.16.09.20.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:20:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 17:20:33 +0000 From: Jean-Philippe Brucker To: Robin Murphy Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, will@kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, jkchen@linux.alibaba.com, leo.yan@linaro.org, uchida.jun@socionext.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] perf/smmuv3: Support devicetree Message-ID: References: <20211116113536.69758-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org> <3b5cb536-5a11-5096-4369-cec3d369ec52@arm.com> <54be6173-59d3-7ce8-e04b-b5197fdc0e10@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54be6173-59d3-7ce8-e04b-b5197fdc0e10@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211116_092057_567551_3F09EB56 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.56 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 05:00:14PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 2021-11-16 15:42, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 12:02:47PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > > > On 2021-11-16 11:35, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > > > > Add devicetree binding for the SMMUv3 PMU, called Performance Monitoring > > > > Counter Group (PMCG) in the spec. Each SMMUv3 implementation can have > > > > multiple independent PMCGs, for example one for the Translation Control > > > > Unit (TCU) and one per Translation Buffer Unit (TBU). > > > > > > > > I previously sent the binding as reply to Jay Chen's thread implementing > > > > device tree support [1]. This posting addresses the comments from that > > > > thread. > > > > > > Ha, I'd also resurrected this and was planning to post it at some point this > > > week[0] - you should have said :) > > > > Ah sorry about that, I just resent because there was some demand for it at > > Linaro > > Heh, no worries - it's not like you were even CC'ed on the thread where I > only mentioned I *might* do it. > > Can I get away with being cheeky and just saying that my review comments are > the diff between my branch and yours, I wonder... Sure, that works for me, I'll send a v2 this week or so Thanks, Jean _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel