From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66BC2C433F5 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 13:31:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=9Mxnw8EGzotiUwj3OcJUMwVrmjsGFfyG6kOqe7H3I7o=; b=iXbvihHFIejtJK Lo/r2/nUnwanS0Rof4jAwBDiP9TVnZZjYozdEneZkDrwrQgFt0g8qBJr3WE7lekOlnRSC6eMx9ePi ceKnN3TjCU2rNAdRuJk5LpLRlDEv7r88HwDynYjs3Er8ojFTFhuJ4taaB0vLIBbQBd/kJ2VfIZPKL jAATABm28BUFfNp3IzCwuz11RQnS7PvKYlliQozEd8JeuBmWLAWGUBIV35h+Zq9L3unNBB0x7f0J6 BkfGgigYPC32SOUrFq2PoJDAu0LFsi6ciIDSn3LnCDvIunqo12aWgDqX5fzPYbKGWVp7vcxrVt/ZR hj+o7Yx9w9qMEitc6kbw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mxUKr-000vWJ-21; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 13:28:45 +0000 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mxUKm-000vUb-FI; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 13:28:42 +0000 Received: from zn.tnic (dslb-088-067-202-008.088.067.pools.vodafone-ip.de [88.67.202.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 9EC541EC02AD; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 14:28:32 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1639574912; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=DBsGJHg+XHDclwUguSafgVP2O7oEz3xCwX1JpFporFo=; b=efq/myXT0PhxslOsyt7D50KCthcaBb1BTRG+wbhQdB4fq255OTyMxBX2CYEIe1Hys9KrJ6 Ba0vLyDN6/QzrkVNVuZOlrfB1yXYWy+uWwRslC/y7O2nigSQl5YhIZOVYz8zH9Fts7tRoK kzLOqLp+FoDdAlVRDOxcwIRE8WWarVI= Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 14:28:22 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Zhen Lei Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Young , Baoquan He , Vivek Goyal , Eric Biederman , kexec@lists.infradead.org, Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap , Feng Zhou , Kefeng Wang , Chen Zhou Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 03/10] x86: kdump: use macro CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX in functions reserve_crashkernel() Message-ID: References: <20211210065533.2023-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> <20211210065533.2023-4-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211210065533.2023-4-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211215_052840_691733_69EE72C0 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.86 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 02:55:26PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote: > @@ -518,7 +519,7 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) > } > } > > - if (crash_base >= (1ULL << 32) && reserve_crashkernel_low()) { > + if (crash_base >= CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX && reserve_crashkernel_low()) { > memblock_phys_free(crash_base, crash_size); > return; > } That's not a equivalent transformation on X86_32. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel