From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E95F3C433F5 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 23:25:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=7vx+kvC9G/k9ZI0mjeRIgGqqgg7eVch/72M42NySUlc=; b=tYhNShstFC6fhj 2fVyKg/c+bJZXQjgUXf80XqnGjuM77qUwe9P7LQbw0LfO3L2WHAcuYkqIrkycccmXY6uPRAlhPoCz q5ncH5mxoCanwQwfFSoeoXOa39pWLxgz2TbqIJRVCyFHTz37NDK5B7XzWvElrjK6bCvaaGkFW90ux sBuXliHivROcj5ZE/kF3yosYd28TZ+cJ9JRBlcgH7UNIprozqOOeOLUwP75/K1qAbnFKt+eDW+pZa /oy8YJ5JLTDgxpmp+DEX/X9hUj3SJ3IbPfHxcU6IidZQ5/6fsZ/MQDiXm/KPljdYIHYQtev1w0iMr +wcVsdpw54BvhvpR+PAg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nJ1kT-00Ag3M-9X; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 23:24:13 +0000 Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nJ1kP-00Ag31-Dt for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 23:24:11 +0000 Received: (Authenticated sender: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E819BC0007; Sat, 12 Feb 2022 23:24:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1644708244; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oFSzZ5yOgdSQAwv0PITlc/tQFNbxlnrDufyb0qNF53Q=; b=T3Nl6zUHyCCqkZ70eVXfYZPR33z37M7lQnQsY+qmZhmbBJnDZ0vkPcvrgeCaDUCrE7XYTG ILeyfuqBi6bYKAeXp/+nAYT3K5KTIk8buMzeNFwPqKGKGGYbtb4y354lm3VK68YPcM9p13 GBXHxFZNceYRpbKJBptTKYI+quWgKOkYq3xEOs79KFibZlf/2IxCxTwvRhrawA52lYqw70 im16ziLbq8q0e2vjmRtKvYMY6aMLDbypJbYyeDS7ToLhecyaFV97jUE+rQL876R3RI52D9 QCqLVoxh7Gfr90O0YJ26z9EbwtX8EIF6afWEBxUKD5ur6J05GKkR6ln6a7XOOw== Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 00:24:02 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Samuel Holland , Chen-Yu Tsai , linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, Jernej Skrabec , Stephen Boyd , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Turquette , Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Alessandro Zummo Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 5/6] clk: sunxi-ng: Add support for the sun6i RTC clocks Message-ID: References: <20220203021736.13434-1-samuel@sholland.org> <20220203021736.13434-6-samuel@sholland.org> <164422443570.21572.13511859513410998733.b4-ty@cerno.tech> <20220211124312.kiw6t25nojvkp2rw@houat> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220211124312.kiw6t25nojvkp2rw@houat> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220212_152409_861369_8C351011 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.59 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 11/02/2022 13:43:12+0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Samuel, > > On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 05:54:02PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote: > > On 2/7/22 3:00 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 20:17:35 -0600, Samuel Holland wrote: > > >> The RTC power domain in sun6i and newer SoCs manages the 16 MHz RC > > >> oscillator (called "IOSC" or "osc16M") and the optional 32 kHz crystal > > >> oscillator (called "LOSC" or "osc32k"). Starting with the H6, this power > > >> domain also handles the 24 MHz DCXO (called variously "HOSC", "dcxo24M", > > >> or "osc24M") as well. The H6 also adds a calibration circuit for IOSC. > > >> > > >> Later SoCs introduce further variations on the design: > > >> - H616 adds an additional mux for the 32 kHz fanout source. > > >> - R329 adds an additional mux for the RTC timekeeping clock, a clock > > >> for the SPI bus between power domains inside the RTC, and removes the > > >> IOSC calibration functionality. > > >> > > >> [...] > > > > > > Applied to local tree (sunxi/clk-for-5.18). > > > > Part of the build failures were because this patch depends on patch 3. Is that > > okay, or should I update this patch to be independent? > > We don't have anything queued up yet, so I think the easiest would be to > merge this through the RTC tree. So nothing to do on your side yet, we > just need Alex to answer :) > I can take the whole series but I think I would need acks from Stephen -- Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel