From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D28ECC433FE for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 17:28:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=NuZSoC5JQbkiktxfSMt4yYnr4T8kSZoV3U2gf6oMGGI=; b=hTL3p+guwT1MvX Y6qMqsyqqa61EYwoJ7+fDjE7mZK/u7mKJTCoFZihOVxMqjNjxYV2v4yN3yn6b8YEie1JGqjEO4uWW 97P7o2t1Etl7+UlQeLFeixFau2rCtNCDGRtzl+xnGb384ELhYYUyGbEmoCa6GURupjkMLUJ6wQWuM TVob96+jHMaZw1srzzEIttYqye7Gjf4eb7Os6+uOwglV9/4t9tZgTN85WYxS04ejVGqjhGuWrkXss UsmawYVcKFC9LsYzNrsRVOxqwr87Vmvs4iWwXdwXULd/3Sb9zbBP8SPrMcOfKrZJVsoVgFcs6lcja L5coY16hdnDtNdSp/5qQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nPSl0-003XeT-ED; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 17:27:22 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nPSkw-003XdT-FI; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 17:27:19 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E52D4B8211A; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 17:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02EF6C004E1; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 17:27:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1646242035; bh=XX+gbWN6d/khISVOWirF+epY3OmJ0EbDPOgJ5dqOVDo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=N8aGkykE+wQjURHstd0nScvLq8LPy77ZrjSFnVf+lF80AE6XC02uex2sTI348BTE5 y608MdYjz4A2HvtzFxrJi3pDwfL58AGLvoRCLHyzFlAZ3A5BSr2ob8PhCC0JkkGfSi 1H6uGKXMak+XL9qEh59sRwZrHwik0fFXLXHx4ueV4CUwMAFbzZ3StOM0ciVB/ACHKc 5Fc1tLapf64ahl1VZQJKUoAQOmQrRuydoDkR6TU4xIw5GZCyhIoJYD5OgsEynMIH5v f4871jWWDv6fR1FSYKTHX07XXbUZqNCzdHpwTIsFJi9ctB6LSVQgVomnoEeR/yFH3S FBgAENBJ4C8wg== Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 22:57:11 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Peter Geis Cc: Rob Herring , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , "open list:GENERIC PHY FRAMEWORK" , Heiko Stuebner , Johan Jonker , Jianqun Xu , Tobias Schramm , Michael Riesch , devicetree , linux-arm-kernel , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Revert "dt-bindings: soc: grf: add naneng combo phy register compatible" Message-ID: References: <20220302143427.447748-1-vkoul@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220302_092718_688411_7C705656 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.22 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 02-03-22, 12:12, Peter Geis wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 12:04 PM Rob Herring wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 8:34 AM Vinod Koul wrote: > > > > > > This reverts commit b3df807e1fb0 ("dt-bindings: soc: grf: add naneng > > > combo phy register compatible") as that was wrongly merged, so better to > > > drop the wrong patch > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul > > > --- > > > I am applying this to phy-next to fix the issue > > > > Reverting will just cause a different warning that it is undocumented. > > The fix in the other thread won't apply either if you revert. > > Reverting and reapplying the original patch would work. > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rockchip/patch/20220208091326.12495-2-yifeng.zhao@rock-chips.com/ It does not apply to phy-next! -- ~Vinod _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel