linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Don't allow SVE to be used with BROKEN_GAS_INST
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 13:58:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yh939U9dn7fvhKPz@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220225184045.5502-1-broonie@kernel.org>

On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 06:40:45PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> We support building the kernel with archaic versions of binutils which
> had some confusion regarding how instructions should be encoded for .inst
> which we work around with the __emit_inst() macro. Unfortunately we have
> not consistently used this macro, one of the places where it's missed being
> the macros that manually encode SVE instructions. This means that kernels
> built with such toolchains have never supported SVE correctly.
> 
> Since these toolchains are very old (some idle research suggested 2015
> era) it seems more sensible to just refuse to build SVE support with them,
> in the unlikely event that someone has a need to use such a toolchain to
> build a kernel which will run on a system with SVE support they can always
> fix this properly but it seems more likely that we will deprecate support
> for these toolchains and remove __emit_inst() before that happens.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index f8e5f64fc40b..4312cc622277 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -1899,6 +1899,7 @@ endmenu
>  config ARM64_SVE
>  	bool "ARM Scalable Vector Extension support"
>  	default y
> +	depends on !BROKEN_GAS_INST

It looks like it's not just SVE affected here. A grep for "\.inst\>"
shows a few places in the crypto code as well. How hard is it to use
__emit_inst() in these places?

-- 
Catalin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-02 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-25 18:40 [PATCH] arm64: Don't allow SVE to be used with BROKEN_GAS_INST Mark Brown
2022-03-02 13:58 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2022-03-02 16:04   ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yh939U9dn7fvhKPz@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).