From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, qperret@google.com,
tabba@google.com, surenb@google.com, kernel-team@android.com,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
Andrew Scull <ascull@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] arm64: asm: Introduce test_sp_overflow macro
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 18:32:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YhUsQZUqgb94EjmD@lakrids> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220222165212.2005066-6-kaleshsingh@google.com>
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 08:51:06AM -0800, Kalesh Singh wrote:
> From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
>
> The asm entry code in the kernel uses a trick to check if VMAP'd stacks
> have overflowed by aligning them at THREAD_SHIFT * 2 granularity and
> checking the SP's THREAD_SHIFT bit.
>
> Protected KVM will soon make use of a similar trick to detect stack
> overflows, so factor out the asm code in a re-usable macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
> [Kalesh - Resolve minor conflicts]
> Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h | 11 +++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 7 +------
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> index e8bd0af0141c..ad40eb0eee83 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h
> @@ -850,4 +850,15 @@ alternative_endif
>
> #endif /* GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_DEFAULT */
>
> +/*
> + * Test whether the SP has overflowed, without corrupting a GPR.
> + */
> +.macro test_sp_overflow shift, label
> + add sp, sp, x0 // sp' = sp + x0
> + sub x0, sp, x0 // x0' = sp' - x0 = (sp + x0) - x0 = sp
> + tbnz x0, #\shift, \label
> + sub x0, sp, x0 // x0'' = sp' - x0' = (sp + x0) - sp = x0
> + sub sp, sp, x0 // sp'' = sp' - x0 = (sp + x0) - x0 = sp
> +.endm
I'm a little unhappy about factoring this out, since it's not really
self-contained and leaves sp and x0 partially-swapped when it branches
to the label. You can't really make that clear with comments on the
macro, and you need comments at each use-sire, so I'd ratehr we just
open-coded a copy of this.
> +
> #endif /* __ASM_ASSEMBLER_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> index 772ec2ecf488..ce99ee30c77e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -53,15 +53,10 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
> sub sp, sp, #PT_REGS_SIZE
> #ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK
> /*
> - * Test whether the SP has overflowed, without corrupting a GPR.
> * Task and IRQ stacks are aligned so that SP & (1 << THREAD_SHIFT)
> * should always be zero.
> */
> - add sp, sp, x0 // sp' = sp + x0
> - sub x0, sp, x0 // x0' = sp' - x0 = (sp + x0) - x0 = sp
> - tbnz x0, #THREAD_SHIFT, 0f
> - sub x0, sp, x0 // x0'' = sp' - x0' = (sp + x0) - sp = x0
> - sub sp, sp, x0 // sp'' = sp' - x0 = (sp + x0) - x0 = sp
> + test_sp_overflow THREAD_SHIFT, 0f
> b el\el\ht\()_\regsize\()_\label
>
> 0:
Further to my comment above, immediately after this we have:
/* Stash the original SP (minus PT_REGS_SIZE) in tpidr_el0. */
msr tpidr_el0, x0
/* Recover the original x0 value and stash it in tpidrro_el0 */
sub x0, sp, x0
msr tpidrro_el0, x0
... which is really surprising with the `test_sp_overflow` macro because
it's not clear that modifies x0 and sp in this way.
Thanks,
Mark.
...
> --
> 2.35.1.473.g83b2b277ed-goog
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-22 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-22 16:51 [PATCH v2 0/9] KVM: arm64: Hypervisor stack enhancements Kalesh Singh
2022-02-22 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] KVM: arm64: Introduce hyp_alloc_private_va_range() Kalesh Singh
2022-02-22 18:53 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-22 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] KVM: arm64: Introduce pkvm_alloc_private_va_range() Kalesh Singh
2022-02-22 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] KVM: arm64: Add guard pages for KVM nVHE hypervisor stack Kalesh Singh
2022-02-22 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] KVM: arm64: Add guard pages for pKVM (protected nVHE) " Kalesh Singh
2022-02-22 18:55 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-22 20:30 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-02-22 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] arm64: asm: Introduce test_sp_overflow macro Kalesh Singh
2022-02-22 18:32 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2022-02-22 20:20 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-02-22 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] KVM: arm64: Detect and handle hypervisor stack overflows Kalesh Singh
2022-02-23 2:04 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-23 9:05 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-23 9:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-02-23 12:34 ` [kbuild-all] " Philip Li
2022-02-23 12:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-02-23 12:56 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-24 10:39 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-02-25 2:12 ` Chen, Rong A
2022-02-25 3:11 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-02-25 15:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-02-25 15:38 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-22 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] KVM: arm64: Add hypervisor overflow stack Kalesh Singh
2022-02-22 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] KVM: arm64: Unwind and dump nVHE HYP stacktrace Kalesh Singh
2022-02-22 16:51 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] KVM: arm64: Symbolize the nVHE HYP backtrace Kalesh Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YhUsQZUqgb94EjmD@lakrids \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=ascull@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox