From: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
To: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
Peng Liang <liangpeng10@huawei.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] KVM: arm64: Generalise VM features into a set of flags
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 20:07:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yi+gmV6xuiCkAtbh@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220314061959.3349716-2-reijiw@google.com>
On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 11:19:57PM -0700, Reiji Watanabe wrote:
> From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>
> We currently deal with a set of booleans for VM features,
> while they could be better represented as set of flags
> contained in an unsigned long, similarily to what we are
> doing on the CPU side.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Gee, that's one popular patch! Just as a heads up, I rebased it on top
of kvmarm/next in:
http://lore.kernel.org/r/20220311174001.605719-2-oupton@google.com
since kvm_arch picked up another bool.
--
Oliver
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-14 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-14 6:19 [PATCH v4 0/3] KVM: arm64: mixed-width check should be skipped for uninitialized vCPUs Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-14 6:19 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] KVM: arm64: Generalise VM features into a set of flags Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-14 20:07 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2022-03-14 6:19 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] KVM: arm64: mixed-width check should be skipped for uninitialized vCPUs Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-14 20:22 ` Oliver Upton
2022-03-15 6:18 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-15 7:48 ` Oliver Upton
2022-03-16 4:22 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-16 6:18 ` Oliver Upton
2022-03-14 6:19 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] KVM: arm64: selftests: Introduce vcpu_width_config Reiji Watanabe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yi+gmV6xuiCkAtbh@google.com \
--to=oupton@google.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=liangpeng10@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).