From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andreyknvl@gmail.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, ardb@kernel.org, dvyukov@google.com,
geert+renesas@glider.be, glider@google.com,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
masahiroy@kernel.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com, yj.chiang@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm: kasan: support CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:37:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YismXDtUZ2cPtVnN@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdasAGFDth-=eKgUFo+4c-638uo2RMbaUap6ent5mmBXbw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 12:08:52AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 2:48 PM Lecopzer Chen
> <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> > Since the framework of KASAN_VMALLOC is well-developed,
> > It's easy to support for ARM that simply not to map shadow of VMALLOC
> > area on kasan_init.
> >
> > Since the virtual address of vmalloc for Arm is also between
> > MODULE_VADDR and 0x100000000 (ZONE_HIGHMEM), which means the shadow
> > address has already included between KASAN_SHADOW_START and
> > KASAN_SHADOW_END.
> > Thus we need to change nothing for memory map of Arm.
> >
> > This can fix ARM_MODULE_PLTS with KASan, support KASan for higmem
> > and provide the first step to support CONFIG_VMAP_STACK with Arm.
> >
> >
> > Test on
> > 1. Qemu with memory 2G and vmalloc=500M for 3G/1G mapping.
> > 2. Qemu with memory 2G and vmalloc=500M for 3G/1G mapping + LPAE.
> > 3. Qemu with memory 2G and vmalloc=500M for 2G/2G mapping.
> >
> > v3:
> > rebase on 5.17-rc5.
> > Add simple doc for "arm: kasan: support CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC"
> > Tweak commit message.
>
> Ater testing this with my kernel-in-vmalloc patches and some hacks, I got
> the kernel booting in the VMALLOC area with KASan enabled!
> See:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-integrator.git/log/?h=kernel-in-vmalloc-v5.17-rc1
>
> That's a pretty serious stress test. So:
> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> for the series.
>
> I suppose you could put this into Russell's patch tracker, it's gonna be
> for kernel v5.19 by now but why stress. It seems I can fix up
> kernel-in-vmalloc on top and submit that for v5.19 as well.
Ard's series already adds vmap stack support (which we've been doing
some last minute panic-debugging on to get it ready for this merge
window), but the above description makes it sound like this series is
a pre-requisit for that.
Is it? Will Ard's work cause further regressions because this series
isn't merged.
Please clarify - and urgently, there is not much time left before the
merge window opens.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-11 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-27 13:47 [PATCH v3 0/2] arm: kasan: support CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC Lecopzer Chen
2022-02-27 13:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Lecopzer Chen
2022-03-11 10:34 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-03-11 10:47 ` Lecopzer Chen
2022-02-27 13:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] arm: kconfig: fix MODULE_PLTS for KASAN with KASAN_VMALLOC Lecopzer Chen
2022-03-10 23:08 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] arm: kasan: support CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC Linus Walleij
2022-03-11 10:37 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2022-03-11 10:52 ` Lecopzer Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YismXDtUZ2cPtVnN@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=yj.chiang@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).