linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] use more system keyrings to verify arm64 kdump kernel image signature
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 12:24:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yjf+GwHNHxuUvFrf@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220318094101.274950-1-coxu@redhat.com>

Hi Coiby,

On 03/18/22 at 05:40pm, Coiby Xu wrote:
> This patch set allows arm64 to use more system keyrings to verify kdump 
> kernel image signature by making the existing code in x64 public.

Could you tell more about why arm64 need use more system keyrings to
verify kdump kernel iamge signature?

What problem have you encountered to make you want to do this?

Thanks
Baoquan


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-21  4:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-18  9:40 [PATCH v4 0/3] use more system keyrings to verify arm64 kdump kernel image signature Coiby Xu
2022-03-18  9:40 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] kexec: clean up arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig Coiby Xu
2022-03-21  4:21   ` Baoquan He
2022-03-22  2:59     ` Coiby Xu
2022-03-22  3:13       ` Baoquan He
2022-03-22  6:57         ` Coiby Xu
2022-03-18  9:41 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] kexec, KEYS: make the code in bzImage64_verify_sig generic Coiby Xu
2022-03-18  9:41 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature Coiby Xu
2022-03-21  4:24 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2022-03-21  8:28   ` [PATCH v4 0/3] use more system keyrings to verify arm64 kdump " Coiby Xu
2022-03-21  8:35     ` Baoquan He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yjf+GwHNHxuUvFrf@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=coxu@redhat.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).