linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
To: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
	Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: Introduce vcpu_width_config
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 08:28:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yjg3Nd1KYmJX5rSG@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YjgYh89k8s+w34FQ@google.com>

On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 06:17:43AM +0000, Oliver Upton wrote:
> Hi Reiji,
> 
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 10:08:04PM -0700, Reiji Watanabe wrote:

[...]

> > +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> 
> In other instances where we define _GNU_SOURCE, it is said we do it for
> program_invocation_short_name. Nonetheless, I cannot find anywhere that
> the symbol is actually being used.
> 
> This looks to be some leftover crud from our internal test library
> before we upstreamed KVM selftests a few years ago.
>

Ah, it's because we're actually using program_invocation_name. This
already gets defined in lib/kvm_util.c, so except for a few oddball
tests that directly call kvm_vm_elf_load(), this is unnecessary.

--
Thanks,
Oliver

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-21  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-21  5:08 [PATCH v5 0/2] KVM: arm64: mixed-width check should be skipped for uninitialized vCPUs Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-21  5:08 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] " Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-21  5:08 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: Introduce vcpu_width_config Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-21  6:17   ` Oliver Upton
2022-03-21  8:28     ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2022-03-22  3:30     ` Reiji Watanabe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yjg3Nd1KYmJX5rSG@google.com \
    --to=oupton@google.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pshier@google.com \
    --cc=rananta@google.com \
    --cc=reijiw@google.com \
    --cc=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).