From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC8DEC433F5 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:05:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=jEdrthyM2GM8sC3+xcmvth+r4ajIl+wpsATv7+Xip5I=; b=k4bI+lggIT5VAt x/N14Lnk1DdHDt4BIRgBCIBB+ZzFwgTR6LvsQiVGvDx10Nxq4GmgaeKo5V1PHVvWrL9rvqL1/Qd/h Vdju0X4nprOFbwLVgjzieIs3bHOHDgfbaOm0nm3mLND/Z7nZiSTFCs5tC7o6RNgHi1bVJqoDXEFvf YAub14Y5QM+FXXyhcnEI7spzRjo5c3ztS3pCDiKmIMpAuvQf3TfpRIaSegN4sYGkeHfGUG4Oe7kDN 7+iWxNDFWaEVM4f6jpzYDdfmt/3gjXHMbPeD0DOyjiNz9rh46RA17CW4Np1rZXhAQQgUs0qUdHopP Yib2iE3qJ3ftDi6OK24Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nWaQr-00AWPj-Dy; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:04:01 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nWaQm-00AWOB-Tg for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:03:58 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FDF4B81C16; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:03:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B053C340EC; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:03:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1647939833; bh=fjzX2BdQHdr3ZaSisD0rP9IQyxDRzYITaNP9a8Lv4Uw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=VKlKsR5IXWOK5v94DA2C7CBG4kD+8/4ucEdUKjxK0HshUFGD4Ks3nqTpoKYYNUQQh yFtaZUUaskv9i6EnHrmuxKqTOXP6RanGWgGLeztREGm12HEbFhNb4uz9dg9irRll0H oHHKGUokk775vkKikfm5va1HmL7KjWTWFAkl+nSA= Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 16:56:08 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Will Deacon Cc: Sudeep Holla , Darren Hart , Dietmar Eggemann , Vincent Guittot , LKML , Linux Arm , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Catalin Marinas , Peter Zijlstra , Valentin Schneider , "D . Scott Phillips" , Ilkka Koskinen , stable@vger.kernel.org, Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] topology: make core_mask include at least cluster_siblings Message-ID: References: <7ac47c67-0b5e-5caa-20bb-a0100a0cb78f@arm.com> <9398d7ad-30e7-890a-3e18-c3011c383585@arm.com> <20220321143021.GB11145@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220321143021.GB11145@willie-the-truck> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220322_020357_148142_FC80C6B0 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.99 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 02:30:22PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 03:55:41PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 08:20:32AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 03:48:50PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, I can see your point. It's the smaller hack. My solution just > > > > prevents us to manipulate the coregroup mask only to get the MC layer > > > > degenerated by the core topology code. But people might say that's a > > > > clever thing to do here. So I'm fine with your original solution as well. > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > Thanks Dietmar, > > > > > > Sudeep, do we have sufficient consensus to pull in this patch? > > > > Indeed. I have already Acked, and sure after all these discussions we have > > concluded that this is the best we can do though not matches everyone's taste. > > > > Greg or Will(not sure why he had asked since v3 doesn't touch arm64), > > Can one of you pick this patch ? > > Right, this doesn't touch arm64 any more so I don't think I'm the right > person to queue it. It's too late for 5.18-rc1. Please rebase and resend it after that is out and I will be glad to queue it up. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel