From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9576C433F5 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 04:50:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=7R5zIt6egOyMijlUIaT3wbQ1bFQEDNJbO2gEhaEhNkw=; b=hZXhssPny8M40A eLR3vCFiI8H4nLdIQTMc9v3L0i2v6aS55d3c7kpbRc3I5PweWjepjkBQZN+esvAvLNzNN8ZfEZ6oj /He50emik6wRhAQsWhKBFfnyern+INr99Ne6MQ05m9E8205Bijw/xxjIDZOIVuC6UtyyEtiilHSTz gQPdedzZ1pn1CpFiIVr4Z+XPJxUfI204A2/hsdqg8ug2G8j/xm2GQgvzZNMYpt2yiezs4ZurPjarJ OPkA9lMN510XQKloYVhNDMLqUGRf6eH4EDt6lrGagT14usYgAXfQb7NJuxCrhuaL/VE7NczpPYAMi eCXlAA3FC2/mpgmMopww==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ncK5A-009OvV-Pi; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 04:49:21 +0000 Received: from helcar.hmeau.com ([216.24.177.18] helo=fornost.hmeau.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ncJnq-009KwE-4J for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 04:31:28 +0000 Received: from gwarestrin.arnor.me.apana.org.au ([192.168.103.7]) by fornost.hmeau.com with smtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Debian)) id 1ncJnK-001Y2A-7U; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 14:30:55 +1000 Received: by gwarestrin.arnor.me.apana.org.au (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 07 Apr 2022 14:30:54 +1000 Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 14:30:54 +1000 From: Herbert Xu To: Catalin Marinas Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Will Deacon , Marc Zyngier , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] crypto: Use ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN instead of ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN Message-ID: References: <20220405135758.774016-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com> <20220405135758.774016-8-catalin.marinas@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220406_213126_216612_9BEC7987 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.76 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 09:49:42AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > Since ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN on arm64 prior to this series is 128, there > is any change to the crypto code. But the crypto API assumes that memory returned by kmalloc is automatically aligned to CRYPTO_MINALIGN, would this still be the case if you change it to ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN? Thanks, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel