From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A75DC433F5 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 19:01:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=dlxUW4XkuSIncjJ+Q8HaZNGy+F/5arbwpK1LGgIpDJQ=; b=OKDyxiKmEHPsJv M5l+u+cn65LctnY6igOEQzOty0uHSuCt3SwEhqQV3fBu4tqNepaE0nL8GSFT6ZXL69gJVze0lPaeC txclVONnr7RTqSHjSwzOTUnRJH5fT5z0miGdJV8sPcmIT2Ymv6y+YTPi0S7CLrmuU9QQ2ZWAZFtf0 WjZkPipr7tp2EsWtJGEqaZKFctfQnH2FWJ0Pgg84ST+/esdhHGHCiuJ/Jn1rTODRIyp3FPfC9T/gJ L2do0x86GtJtg9ZwzI7Z0MX6+DQyf/x2l5kpG/ibXXaLQuPw3y461DW8b7XkWv5ixABb9fy4+Ag6d WHdlzw0Spfjh/rOXa4vQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ngt4Z-005sXK-R4; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 18:59:36 +0000 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ngt4T-005sRy-QH; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 18:59:32 +0000 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ea971b5839329c23fffea6a903.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ea:971b:5839:329c:23ff:fea6:a903]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id DA1CB1EC0535; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 20:59:19 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1650394759; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=yrDZi8RMHpoQYGjBhUR4MquierfF40OlMH05yPCr678=; b=NPvKM/Wy8mQo++H2OW7Voa1icNv7WJbylKqcGbmX9/8e2j/yCYoiJqcJ0+5o9B005Mpzj/ TD+yw6C+vRnnfSqzgCvjEYc+SWyUsoaK+QzztzQGEAAJVJC2oEMbsbx74N6rtA0u15QPpf KNmXSR9VCSZUViMcCDgEmNh/kg8/la0= Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 20:59:16 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: LKML , Linux Crypto Mailing List , Thomas Gleixner , Arnd Bergmann , Theodore Ts'o , Dominik Brodowski , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Geert Uytterhoeven , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , "David S . Miller" , Richard Weinberger , Anton Ivanov , Johannes Berg , Ingo Molnar , Dave Hansen , "H . Peter Anvin" , Chris Zankel , Max Filippov , Stephen Boyd , Dinh Nguyen , linux-arm-kernel , linux-m68k , "open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" , linux-riscv , sparclinux , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, X86 ML , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/11] x86: use fallback for random_get_entropy() instead of zero Message-ID: References: <20220419111650.1582274-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> <20220419111650.1582274-8-Jason@zx2c4.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220419_115930_066951_490968F6 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.32 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 08:38:41PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > I think I prefer doing (a), and leaving (b) for another time when you > or another x86 maintainer can do so. But I'll do whichever you say. > Which would you like? We are switching all feature checks to cpu_feature_enabled() so you might as well do the new preferred way of checking when adding a new function and so that we have one less place to touch. Which is appreciated. :) Thx! -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel