From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 879D8C433EF for ; Wed, 4 May 2022 17:57:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=/jyw7HABRqignZOPHGiQaA44q4XQYlE49Bojx4XhilE=; b=sct4ZcDrMRJHnY rWXlKebuooanGiDKMcXO//ELMbB80iBRvs3fvK7h9w4+aOjM6eQsYBVrkt6Nk0f+VCI0J1Z0w5gBs K0JXhD++i3u9CCc3gG6VVRtpEF4hECnBKYVUOKBwkdt8mN6bs7QhW7fIgcGoKG4sbV6cxZYZT+RcD lQGKtnpvg+Ena3Dy5TlYbHGmWxXsqlLFP2+Bzjihun6KoRB07d38Efs42uxZKebyRVB4x5iBjEo/p jO1p1bqOKMsRgws+vadvRTMzxYXSEsNW5v54re6+8ltpYIYUSfcYUUdZEXeBpRHEYd+Hie5Hdqlww zUkGA8dsrmufATjWJ4AA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nmJEg-00C3QW-A5; Wed, 04 May 2022 17:56:26 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nmJEd-00C3PW-B6 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 17:56:24 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64449B824A6; Wed, 4 May 2022 17:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14B50C385A4; Wed, 4 May 2022 17:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 18:56:15 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Mark Brown Cc: Mark Rutland , Will Deacon , Marc Zyngier , Suzuki K Poulose , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/12] arm64/sysreg: Generate definitions for SCTLR_EL1 Message-ID: References: <20220503170233.507788-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20220503170233.507788-13-broonie@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220504_105623_566743_5FBC31E9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.45 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 05:40:42PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 05:32:55PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 06:02:33PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > Automatically generate register definitions for SCTLR_EL1. No functional > > > change. > > > > -#define SYS_SCTLR_EL1 sys_reg(3, 0, 1, 0, 0) > > > > +Sysreg SCTLR_EL1 3 0 1 9 9 > > > Looks like the 0s got replaced with 9s somehow? > > > I guess at EL1 we happen to get away with that being completely wrong since > > we'll use the assembler's version of the register definition, and only KVM > > notices. > > Ah, indeed - that'll just have been a typo when I originally entered > things. I'll fix it in place, I haven't pushed the branch out yet. Thanks both for confirming. -- Catalin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel