Re: [PATCH 2/3] staging: vchiq_arm: get rid of global device structure

From: Adrien Thierry <athierry@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
	Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@kernel.org>,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] staging: vchiq_arm: get rid of global device structure
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 14:11:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YnQTPmNAvpbQl5Ws@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8483a250-da97-1875-4ea3-598f46ae96ce@i2se.com>

Hi Stefan,

Thanks for your feedback.

> i understand the motivation, but could you please explain more in detail
> why you decided to add vchiq_instance instead of device reference? I
> think vchiq_instance is a more internal structure which should be
> avoided in kernel consumers like bcm2835-audio or mmal.

I used the vchiq_instance instead of the device reference because in order
to get rid of the vchiq_states array (patch 3/3 [1]), I needed another way
to access the vchiq_state in the 'handle_to_service' function. So I passed
the vchiq_instance to it (I could also have passed the state directly
instead of the instance), and this propagated in the caller chain all the
way up to 'vchiq_bulk_transmit' and friends which are used in the
bcm2835-audio consumer.  Please let me know if you see a better way of
doing this :)

Thanks,

Adrien

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220502183045.206519-4-athierry@redhat.com/

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel