From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF398C433EF for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 09:28:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=MhXQjlnkT27wkbhhLFRI9TMkUye+LnQ+6pZ7qSKRvTk=; b=10ZI1Kg/XPgZHt hK3Dt85F6VBYc2qKTG02vwvGCRJD/+jjGV5pG9UZumEEMPzXPxUP/lNyYkLyhE0Zwb0o4PK762XwJ IQYQ7F8027Ts8W2K6hH5wq8cpueedbl9t6jLJFGrwGn34r3gHp4wLK2PTj+63YKpHVysULJpBHI2O NBk+dFPtJkkwZ+HGtFCqdlyfRBXrwP4atf/sLXK6ZEQWDp/j/ZvA7WYBt05H2L1GrVaFZsEjM8mCs +jMuP+PYzZvVjxFI517M3n1BUEfT8YdPEvxeeTh5A2lhvk7ovAGtS9q3UytW9JkXCYBizgcogvroX 877mvRu3EbDsd4CiZY2A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nyVU2-006CgE-No; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 09:26:43 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nyVJI-0067xK-2E for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 09:15:37 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0DEDB81E06; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 09:15:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E9E9C385A5; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 09:15:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1654593332; bh=71J8tbY0PQ1Gu6dEU4y9Z9et5FuCkQMlodd8idd5KuM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=nczUUTzvaL2rPA3pyJ+2us4OihBNRyXBW1HvEDaW9szUdVPUpY8l3s+hoCo4dgvaY S2Ga6GashrGJNf7R5tdJSROyx+/F8glH4seWbHdMxF1kQ2eo9o6vcX7wS9gx+2eKkP rChlwRrdZJkIJObli+LI+zfD0REWr7CPHXVsdQ1g= Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 11:10:29 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Phil Elwell Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Russell King - ARM Linux , Russell King , linux-arm-kernel , LKML , Catalin Marinas , Stephen Boyd , Ard Biesheuvel , stable Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: initialize jump labels before setup_machine_fdt() Message-ID: References: <8cc7ebe4-442b-a24b-9bb0-fce6e0425ee6@raspberrypi.com> <0f6458d7-037a-fa4d-8387-7de833288fb9@raspberrypi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0f6458d7-037a-fa4d-8387-7de833288fb9@raspberrypi.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220607_021536_340262_EB6E7A52 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.22 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 09:47:30AM +0100, Phil Elwell wrote: > Hi Jason, > > On 07/06/2022 09:30, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > Hi Phil, > > > > Thanks for testing this. Can you let me know if v1 of this works? > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220602212234.344394-1-Jason@zx2c4.com/ > > > > (I'll also fashion a revert for this part of stable.) > > > > Jason > > Thanks for the quick response, but that doesn't work for me either. Let me > say again that I'm on a downstream kernel (rpi-5.15.y) so this may not be a > universal problem, but merging either of these fixing patches would be fatal > for us. I have reports of a "clean" 5.15.45 working just fine on a rpi. Anything special in your tree that isn't upstream yet that might be conflicting with this? Any chance you can try a kernel.org release instead? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel