From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DC6CC433EF for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 21:09:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Up/nY36h27Ig6fV/6XB7ug4jXneorE9sWGVTGZc0kAg=; b=v8e9x8WXIkjZa2 M1B2blIawFdTA39QEHbAZJv9rXjq1lzm3Xm0As+4LyCHpzgoWqe0wrI0NLa7lIY777Jbowswm8ptP 1nq+XVmP4JW2IX84WM/yX/6tRqsrzyt/5V+U7DwHWEU2mH215tw4MZPI/1Qys6YbqEF9+E10AyR87 Fp6DTHEWSs5+sY4Yv1bJ1733H1qrz49jxtLAkB8oPfAvY2WuHBDe2inngOQdmM1b0Ih+kjK4VgZFv IqijgurscznlOuc4ucQe0Id+OjlmJ7uz+5cg+KxjTX/bMBznaPvDee9JuuHkzxVvQPF6sA5usY+jk naprq5D4kaVyN44ttXPA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nws3p-004Kq5-Gj; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 21:08:53 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nws3m-004Kpc-Ju for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 21:08:52 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F36D2B81F37; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 21:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75723C385A5; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 21:08:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 22:08:41 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: Stephen Boyd , Will Deacon , Dominik Brodowski , Ard Biesheuvel , linux-arm-kernel , LKML , Douglas Anderson , Hsin-Yi Wang , Steven Rostedt , patches@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Initialize jump labels before setup_machine_fdt() Message-ID: References: <20220602022109.780348-1-swboyd@chromium.org> <165419885870.2681883.10934677413962491141.b4-ty@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220602_140850_837942_D06BDDB0 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 24.61 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 10:18:04PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 9:46 PM Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 09:42:49PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 9:41 PM Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > > On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 19:21:09 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > > A static key warning splat appears during early boot on arm64 systems > > > > > that credit randomness from devicetrees that contain an "rng-seed" > > > > > property. This is because setup_machine_fdt() is called before > > > > > jump_label_init() during setup_arch(). Let's swap the order of these two > > > > > calls so that jump labels are initialized before the devicetree is > > > > > unflattened and the rng seed is credited. > > > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > Applied to arm64 (for-next/core), thanks! > > > > > > > > [1/1] arm64: Initialize jump labels before setup_machine_fdt() > > > > https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/73e2d827a501 > > > > > > I'm not sure precisely what your for-next tag corresponds to, but just > > > FYI, this should probably go into 5.19 asap and be marked for stable@. > > > > The for-next/core branch should go in 5.19-rc1 (I'll send a pull request > > tomorrow). There's no need to cc stable since the fixed commit just went > > in (unless you mean something else by "marked for stable"). > > It is actually in stable, so please do CC. Otherwise I'll just forward manually. Ah, I didn't know this (the fixed commit doesn't have a cc stable either). So please forward it manually once Linus pulls it. Thanks. -- Catalin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel