From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6558EC43334 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 23:08:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=EvkVCWD+lvHkTqJi82+DiDggQbNZeefvectJ9ZuPglY=; b=LiR0AbpJ9bz7pY 8rDZ87929UFzSREOrK1ZirpAODOdw9JEOjEfuVaD6Cf2XL05hdOgZZKn/9YJubjBvcg8oOKDE1TM/ f2nbXdHVqVFrxCK/G3jq3FfKPUiENcaDxdQNRjpRaANqBilyNIT8Y3JkRU9GBfr4oKz+U3R3A9pwR xiKksza/KNmvUoNMfPQRku740F2Pfo+xVOg3bfrooMEh/E9XiNkHplbTZsE5uSpOs1kjsvfXWmP04 tVL7rm86OjEVbg5/s+F1eeQ/tZDm0QKLvPg0i5s85NLh/H9cyJ+/YIkwGnRRLFQ/bG5fu9CaWW8Co Y6sD+F5O+xsbZIl37DuA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1o2L3s-009Wge-AX; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 23:07:32 +0000 Received: from mail-bn8nam04on20605.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([2a01:111:f400:7e8d::605] helo=NAM04-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1o2L3p-009Wbl-7I; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 23:07:30 +0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=B2u1DuZRSJtYp1iYwBrTRinuMfGzrZL9LEraKsC9XGIevLrpfG7FQa/DXfJgh3WYPBVpZkg8R1HKgauL+oE4ogIyiBDhczlJCBgi6rdZofHqVq97NxK1OkjFbqtdH2PM9AV+bBz9iSBhD5QztoAir5etC0Y7/2dHgNSLmnUxUcCjDIA3ivTglW1mBeOq6fVPsq3vpVc2zFtxIVmL2cAUoh8pBSWpDWbvAffn7LYzheSoWU9OAOYbX006hjw/NDtEUJjbYLT+IrO1jXqv0S5NQXAm3ejlunludt5iyiEYOf0VlarrOrLIfB9Pnn+Tu5y1VW38OhECWw8ooQZmJ5HRnQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=ZLqILRQ8qtWCoOCdvWIzsW3EHWsqOopa7YG7IislUhQ=; b=niPg26Two2vNEDuiElaBDjx2COtJriFJvOLp0uIaCL2rlrGuSIbk2D0RpUE+6zazMA9GLSRh63swn/pKktvHhbYegMcDBBnLMmUw4tUVK63ibN2bjkW2Ohdm2qhJn+pj9gGdWvviqAGjsxi9eUuufP3cDkShr8v31Y33M0BdMA9wgBXwIWlfGP5/WtS0hBmuZnObllDRHaxVAEE2IJTC7Ui4TbSgr/onHuTCdWgg3sVXtJIyeOIU2BD0VlOpOxtcavuZ2WBe2G15s6ie0HXAmxAySHhytd2lMbLmSRVb4FnDloC0I/MLquZQ2PG794nIyuDm5ChPL4rGz0VKraEpfQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 12.22.5.234) smtp.rcpttodomain=svenpeter.dev smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dmarc=pass (p=reject sp=reject pct=100) action=none header.from=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Nvidia.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ZLqILRQ8qtWCoOCdvWIzsW3EHWsqOopa7YG7IislUhQ=; b=N6EY401QARm2CcqK/sz57/2L26KKb/UTfFojb0OqFFGZlk91ppipJDvblWmndJTRNljY7KYyrCEUHecgPYftA+GfEzuIUdD/G8Kz1JZJXHLXRxag8Unz6uModf8jbkXih9IwSk6783gbFmemug8gheFy6xRrZneH4X3SfLFzQ45YLRx1bJxVFTCqYrUIyIiHCCo4R3FHN+CJz0nX8HAErQ7mPqQr2i1zpcBgPE3I0yHhqAbx+rylIV+4uIsfTZTuXhgWhGJCdp9yK8UFkei07eKnDqLux8t/BDXUP+YfBxUHy9Bp7fJVd6qIjyuKqqYb+QWv/HFhsT4Cf6xLYDETEQ== Received: from DM3PR14CA0132.namprd14.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:0:53::16) by PH7PR12MB5975.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:1da::19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5332.14; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 23:07:24 +0000 Received: from DM6NAM11FT046.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:0:53:cafe::e) by DM3PR14CA0132.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:0:53::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5353.14 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 23:07:24 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 12.22.5.234) smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates 12.22.5.234 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=12.22.5.234; helo=mail.nvidia.com; pr=C Received: from mail.nvidia.com (12.22.5.234) by DM6NAM11FT046.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.172.121) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.5353.14 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 23:07:24 +0000 Received: from drhqmail201.nvidia.com (10.126.190.180) by DRHQMAIL101.nvidia.com (10.27.9.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.32; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 23:07:24 +0000 Received: from drhqmail202.nvidia.com (10.126.190.181) by drhqmail201.nvidia.com (10.126.190.180) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.22; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 16:07:23 -0700 Received: from Asurada-Nvidia (10.127.8.11) by mail.nvidia.com (10.126.190.181) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.22 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 16:07:21 -0700 Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 16:07:20 -0700 From: Nicolin Chen To: "robin.murphy@arm.com" , "Tian, Kevin" CC: "joro@8bytes.org" , "will@kernel.org" , "marcan@marcan.st" , "sven@svenpeter.dev" , "robdclark@gmail.com" , "baolu.lu@linux.intel.com" , "matthias.bgg@gmail.com" , "orsonzhai@gmail.com" , "baolin.wang7@gmail.com" , "zhang.lyra@gmail.com" , "jean-philippe@linaro.org" , "alex.williamson@redhat.com" , "jgg@nvidia.com" , "jordan@cosmicpenguin.net" , "thierry.reding@gmail.com" , "alyssa@rosenzweig.io" , "linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" , "saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "jonathanh@nvidia.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "yangyingliang@huawei.com" , "gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , "christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "isaacm@codeaurora.org" , "cohuck@redhat.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" , "dwmw2@infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] vfio/iommu_type1: Simplify group attachment Message-ID: References: <20220616000304.23890-1-nicolinc@nvidia.com> <20220616000304.23890-6-nicolinc@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 74598408-44ba-43b6-c24e-08da50b62411 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: PH7PR12MB5975:EE_ X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:12.22.5.234;CTRY:US;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:mail.nvidia.com;PTR:InfoNoRecords;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230016)(4636009)(36840700001)(40470700004)(46966006)(4326008)(26005)(70586007)(86362001)(7416002)(82310400005)(33716001)(316002)(2906002)(40460700003)(9686003)(83380400001)(7406005)(8676002)(5660300002)(47076005)(498600001)(8936002)(186003)(55016003)(70206006)(426003)(81166007)(110136005)(356005)(54906003)(36860700001)(336012)(36900700001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: Nvidia.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jun 2022 23:07:24.4666 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 74598408-44ba-43b6-c24e-08da50b62411 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a;Ip=[12.22.5.234];Helo=[mail.nvidia.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM6NAM11FT046.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PH7PR12MB5975 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220617_160729_497683_D5BA71D6 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.91 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 02:53:13AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote: > > > ... > > > > - if (resv_msi) { > > > > + if (resv_msi && !domain->msi_cookie) { > > > > ret = iommu_get_msi_cookie(domain->domain, > > > > resv_msi_base); > > > > if (ret && ret != -ENODEV) > > > > goto out_detach; > > > > + domain->msi_cookie = true; > > > > } > > > > > > why not moving to alloc_attach_domain() then no need for the new > > > domain field? It's required only when a new domain is allocated. > > > > When reusing an existing domain that doesn't have an msi_cookie, > > we can do iommu_get_msi_cookie() if resv_msi is found. So it is > > not limited to a new domain. > > Looks msi_cookie requirement is per platform (currently only > for smmu. see arm_smmu_get_resv_regions()). If there is > no mixed case then above check is not required. Do you mean "reusing existing domain" for the "mixed case"? > But let's hear whether Robin has a different thought here. Yea, sure. > > > > - iommu_domain_free(domain->domain); > > > > - list_del(&domain->next); > > > > - kfree(domain); > > > > - vfio_iommu_aper_expand(iommu, &iova_copy); > > > > > > Previously the aperture is adjusted when a domain is freed... > > > > > > > - vfio_update_pgsize_bitmap(iommu); > > > > - } > > > > - /* > > > > - * Removal of a group without dirty tracking may allow > > > > - * the iommu scope to be promoted. > > > > - */ > > > > - if (!group->pinned_page_dirty_scope) { > > > > - iommu->num_non_pinned_groups--; > > > > - if (iommu->dirty_page_tracking) > > > > - vfio_iommu_populate_bitmap_full(iommu); > > > > - } > > > > + vfio_iommu_detach_destroy_domain(domain, iommu, > > > > group); > > > > kfree(group); > > > > break; > > > > } > > > > > > > > + vfio_iommu_aper_expand(iommu, &iova_copy); > > > > > > but now it's done for every group detach. The aperture is decided > > > by domain geometry which is not affected by attached groups. > > > > Yea, I've noticed this part. Actually Jason did this change for > > simplicity, and I think it'd be safe to do so? > > Perhaps detach_destroy() can return a Boolean to indicate whether > a domain is destroyed. It could be a solution but doesn't feel that common for a clean function to have a return value indicating a special case. Maybe passing in "&domain" so that we can check if it's NULL after? _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel