From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6CA3CCA479 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 19:10:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=uk5W+XqPo+kc6lLofvhuVRgCZg2RTup7fkS6EXe6ql4=; b=iVGc9wUxMJs/QO 2/Cff45GYF7eW7Aet1p3Yc6DL49rFDxfRw5HUuhupDRmKlSv2nq2uPZ4A6gq/I4w+iIkogg3S5Bwp k6qoTwznOZkP/vTIVcXGO6Lqs+VQonq4ojeywetFnk86Ol48UZc2Wqa8d8ESDy4unSweOt3fjwMgO h1+76QXghV+/INLcIeS1cOc8rvpmLt2yNTIQ+4TXGtkZjzG///kfNaMKJ3sogCvzq4vXNViMwwwEs pGjES32pQHREtAbq0N+pe1CalpDXChfleXL7QVphxdj7gG/VTf34HUyswuU/t/5X84XmMDh7Atrne dMo556s4m/rRKFpy8ucQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1o7M0Z-006Uc2-CW; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 19:08:51 +0000 Received: from mail-mw2nam12on2053.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.244.53] helo=NAM12-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1o7M0V-006Ua1-DF for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 19:08:48 +0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=P2yBwbVHhlwqWMr+rcJih38kR2f0WcmuhDG0qEHZhtZ0K50xtf17Gym5YjNWk85gSZuAOsQvojhFEyfEXL0XPeA9LbWW1UBB44pkAjoP7bXutp/15NbZBA8eQG5Lz6Yf/3fVDIZK1MwZgAflZbk02juezDV2oJVY8lUjGCQemccQxvqPAmZKO/2yCpqutsbwUbzebbAtfI4u6GmSgm+GTWh5sLLM9gFj6d9nNFIzDvEaqyusfZKvYxCvcFh7x9TIDtzIH+0p+C8LPQHdNjetQu3csl12FDOPvlQLfiervYn66W2OrtQVGY+UfUcK4BsUmz2vssrt2JjDwgxONc26Ww== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=pgBBg6RFOOt4nf3b+D6oUcpI2maX3OP0rTgHRFsoUH4=; b=VR4F3ijcYmdoFvMsyDY2UaSLno2lEYhjxnYbmiEordlyUV8DzaekrHSXNzm0G2MQ/NVsPB8jnaGA8O20jaE4Nnep+F8uMcxNc3cSLz670nAjgZu6FpivW5+KzY61zUEYpyHWq99yPyLbzaLfGuejw4HTKNexrXIviGfOkuQRlKit/XL6d2loRRkGZebj/XkZIFXb6hxKyc42uWADCh1+r/iZY13gL7zjNA7Jp7yT0Nh2HAsjVDtsWQA8I2Oqdt86ExRBVrpemhxM6laDofOVEzlDC+bcgWxm4+qjoe5E7OlG98JVUJncGsiA0kJ5IEBKEkLnLBXPSk1EqvmEBWSmwA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 12.22.5.238) smtp.rcpttodomain=gmail.com smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dmarc=pass (p=reject sp=reject pct=100) action=none header.from=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Nvidia.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=pgBBg6RFOOt4nf3b+D6oUcpI2maX3OP0rTgHRFsoUH4=; b=qzqIZeYdIapE3Dpa9LTsO93rbewoTVN6+UbAlesOcJz4nOGJZ6Av58V+cK/1O67mxQlMR9XlzbttqDA88QnehrRHfVF2WnXuYTbaKA0QCgFWNJFSjPs5b0XyzvJ5YryWX9kyXoVA0s47i5tyRA+5g3uaseRd8pgicFqobHC6EhUhcatWvDExZ6oTabfa0z+C9h3lzbQ92Hdm+IgmEGG8hqgiL+TD9pU/Cur7b3kciUmFXmzbqIMO3hsxVcjhjps/GyFh9cCFiDBKV2Vr1UCzXvVOKlTj09WRdwejvrIGp+uGfKHekEsB8/YXFcca351lk1+Y2WfiGNaHbCLw1Z0bSw== Received: from MW4PR03CA0162.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:8d::17) by MW3PR12MB4441.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:59::9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5395.17; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 19:08:42 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM11FT007.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:8d:cafe::cd) by MW4PR03CA0162.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:303:8d::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.5395.15 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 19:08:42 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 12.22.5.238) smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates 12.22.5.238 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=12.22.5.238; helo=mail.nvidia.com; pr=C Received: from mail.nvidia.com (12.22.5.238) by CO1NAM11FT007.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.174.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.5395.14 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 19:08:42 +0000 Received: from rnnvmail201.nvidia.com (10.129.68.8) by DRHQMAIL105.nvidia.com (10.27.9.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.32; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 19:08:41 +0000 Received: from rnnvmail202.nvidia.com (10.129.68.7) by rnnvmail201.nvidia.com (10.129.68.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.26; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 12:08:41 -0700 Received: from Asurada-Nvidia (10.127.8.10) by mail.nvidia.com (10.129.68.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.26 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 12:08:39 -0700 Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 12:08:37 -0700 From: Nicolin Chen To: Robin Murphy Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain and device/group Message-ID: References: <20220630203635.33200-1-nicolinc@nvidia.com> <20220630203635.33200-2-nicolinc@nvidia.com> <2ccb6033-4c34-ff59-50a8-549c924d269d@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2ccb6033-4c34-ff59-50a8-549c924d269d@arm.com> X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 01b6b436-906b-4382-a2f9-08da5b951d31 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: MW3PR12MB4441:EE_ X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:12.22.5.238;CTRY:US;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:mail.nvidia.com;PTR:InfoNoRecords;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230016)(4636009)(136003)(396003)(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(40470700004)(36840700001)(46966006)(36860700001)(2906002)(41300700001)(7416002)(7406005)(4326008)(33716001)(8676002)(6916009)(40480700001)(40460700003)(54906003)(316002)(70206006)(55016003)(86362001)(70586007)(82310400005)(478600001)(47076005)(81166007)(5660300002)(426003)(82740400003)(356005)(53546011)(186003)(336012)(8936002)(26005)(9686003)(36900700001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: Nvidia.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jul 2022 19:08:42.3768 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 01b6b436-906b-4382-a2f9-08da5b951d31 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a;Ip=[12.22.5.238];Helo=[mail.nvidia.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CO1NAM11FT007.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MW3PR12MB4441 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220701_120847_639780_3F74D258 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 27.32 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: marcan@marcan.st, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com, will@kernel.org, alyssa@rosenzweig.io, jean-philippe@linaro.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, zhang.lyra@gmail.com, joro@8bytes.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, jonathanh@nvidia.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev, jgg@nvidia.com, yangyingliang@huawei.com, orsonzhai@gmail.com, gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, sven@svenpeter.dev, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, john.garry@huawei.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, chenxiang66@hisilicon.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, cohuck@redhat.com, robdclark@gmail.com, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, baolin.wang7@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 07:17:38PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > On 01/07/2022 5:43 pm, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 11:21:48AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c > > > > index 2ed3594f384e..072cac5ab5a4 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c > > > > @@ -1135,10 +1135,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev) > > > > struct arm_smmu_device *smmu; > > > > int ret; > > > > > > > > - if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &arm_smmu_ops) { > > > > - dev_err(dev, "cannot attach to SMMU, is it on the same bus?\n"); > > > > - return -ENXIO; > > > > - } > > > > + if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &arm_smmu_ops) > > > > + return -EMEDIUMTYPE; > > > > > > This is the wrong check, you want the "if (smmu_domain->smmu != smmu)" > > > condition further down. If this one fails it's effectively because the > > > device doesn't have an IOMMU at all, and similar to patch #3 it will be > > > > Thanks for the review! I will fix that. The "on the same bus" is > > quite eye-catching. > > > > > removed once the core code takes over properly (I even have both those > > > patches written now!) > > > > Actually in my v1 the proposal for ops check returned -EMEDIUMTYPE > > also upon an ops mismatch, treating that too as an incompatibility. > > Do you mean that we should have fine-grained it further? > > On second look, I think this particular check was already entirely > redundant by the time I made the fwspec conversion to it, oh well. Since > it remains harmless for the time being, let's just ignore it entirely > until we can confidently say goodbye to the whole lot[1]. That looks cleaner! > I don't think there's any need to differentiate an instance mismatch > from a driver mismatch, once the latter becomes realistically possible, > mostly due to iommu_domain_alloc() also having to become device-aware to > know which driver to allocate from. Thus as far as a user is concerned, > if attaching a device to an existing domain fails with -EMEDIUMTYPE, > allocating a new domain using the given device, and attaching to that, > can be expected to succeed, regardless of why the original attempt was > rejected. In fact even in the theoretical different-driver-per-bus model > the same principle still holds up. I see. Thanks for the explanation. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel