From: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, conor.dooley@microchip.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] arch_topology: Fix cache attributes detection in the CPU hotplug path
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 18:52:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YtBX8WX+oyPww/m+@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220713133344.1201247-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Hi Sudeep,
Thank you for the fix!
On Wednesday 13 Jul 2022 at 14:33:44 (+0100), Sudeep Holla wrote:
> init_cpu_topology() is called only once at the boot and all the cache
> attributes are detected early for all the possible CPUs. However when
> the CPUs are hotplugged out, the cacheinfo gets removed. While the
> attributes are added back when the CPUs are hotplugged back in as part
> of CPU hotplug state machine, it ends up called quite late after the
> update_siblings_masks() are called in the secondary_start_kernel()
> resulting in wrong llc_sibling_masks.
>
> Move the call to detect_cache_attributes() inside update_siblings_masks()
> to ensure the cacheinfo is updated before the LLC sibling masks are
> updated. This will fix the incorrect LLC sibling masks generated when
> the CPUs are hotplugged out and hotplugged back in again.
>
> Reported-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 16 ++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> Hi Conor,
>
> Ionela reported an issue with the CPU hotplug and as a fix I need to
> move the call to detect_cache_attributes() which I had thought to keep
> it there from first but for no reason had moved it to init_cpu_topology().
>
> Wonder if this fixes the -ENOMEM on RISC-V as this one is called on the
> cpu in the secondary CPUs init path while init_cpu_topology executed
> detect_cache_attributes() for all possible CPUs much earlier. I think
> this might help as the percpu memory might be initialised in this case.
>
> Anyways give this a try, also test the CPU hotplug and check if nothing
> is broken on RISC-V. We noticed this bug only on one platform while
>
> Regards,
> Sudeep
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> index 441e14ac33a4..0424b59b695e 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> @@ -732,7 +732,11 @@ const struct cpumask *cpu_clustergroup_mask(int cpu)
> void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpuid)
> {
> struct cpu_topology *cpu_topo, *cpuid_topo = &cpu_topology[cpuid];
> - int cpu;
> + int cpu, ret;
> +
> + ret = detect_cache_attributes(cpuid);
> + if (ret)
> + pr_info("Early cacheinfo failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
> /* update core and thread sibling masks */
> for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> @@ -821,7 +825,7 @@ __weak int __init parse_acpi_topology(void)
> #if defined(CONFIG_ARM64) || defined(CONFIG_RISCV)
> void __init init_cpu_topology(void)
> {
> - int ret, cpu;
> + int ret;
> reset_cpu_topology();
> ret = parse_acpi_topology();
> @@ -836,13 +840,5 @@ void __init init_cpu_topology(void)
> reset_cpu_topology();
> return;
> }
> -
> - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - ret = detect_cache_attributes(cpu);
> - if (ret) {
> - pr_info("Early cacheinfo failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> }
> #endif
> --2.37.1
>
Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Tested-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Kind regards,
Ionela.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-14 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-13 13:33 [PATCH -next] arch_topology: Fix cache attributes detection in the CPU hotplug path Sudeep Holla
2022-07-13 14:03 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-07-13 14:18 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-13 16:04 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-14 14:17 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-14 15:01 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-14 15:27 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-14 16:00 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-14 16:10 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-15 9:11 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-15 9:16 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-15 14:04 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-15 15:41 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-07-14 17:52 ` Ionela Voinescu [this message]
2022-07-18 17:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-07-18 17:57 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-19 10:29 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YtBX8WX+oyPww/m+@arm.com \
--to=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).