From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6952BC00140 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 12:34:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=P37UQ66Mh5XYMUE3Q2kA+5XSKbSWopUjEdiNCJjiGPg=; b=EBWxbus2JjNvPO l2/Qx+SmpTT37rs5yr3atNCZ3ZqRiHXHDlgech4h4S7KtyE8mYzduJNjMpQn91H7oEUiffJu5f73R GsrMAPngIiZOaRUnplYAKVGrEwoWwMZigbJPUvMTHC1/dIIqw2d+JgA64iIQITgAmeC7xkqyYrz1n jtnSCnQmuvj9aY7HKet4LO1IQPHbu6+Fh6wEYpKWlG5a+VdO9HofwNgJ+fIt9GTffuxlixEhU4Reu zRByZMY+4kGHVoRlx+HGkuDuXyf9qPdL0aES/X5pgCQQynjK7v2AhdU8dRcL4Y+EtXxhSQ92RsWWb H5Vhk5dNhPplow8dny5A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oL1x2-00DjTm-IA; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 12:33:45 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oL1wx-00DjRE-8Q for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 12:33:40 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544A3ED1; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 05:33:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from FVFF77S0Q05N (unknown [10.57.44.193]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14DEF3F5A1; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 05:33:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 13:33:33 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Will Deacon Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Marc Zyngier , broonie@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, kaleshsingh@google.com, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com, tabba@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] arm64: stacktrace: cleanups and improvements Message-ID: References: <20220805124522.706457-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> <20220808115907.GC32107@willie-the-truck> <20220808122831.GA32320@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220808122831.GA32320@willie-the-truck> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220808_053339_375874_9B6A9C85 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.69 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 01:28:32PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 01:11:15PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 12:59:08PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 01:45:14PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > > This series is a set of improvements for the recently merged stacktrace > > > > rework queued in the kvmarm next branch, along the lines of my prior > > > > suggestions. I'm hoping that it would be possible to queue this for > > > > -rc1. > > > > > > What justifies this for inclusion in -rc1? Although the series looks pretty > > > good to me, it seems to be cleanup and refactoring which could wait for > > > 5.21 (or whatever it ends up being called). What am I missing? > > > > If you think this should wait, that's fine by me. I plan to build atop this > > with further rework and just wanted to get the trivial bits out of the way > > early. > > Although this stuff is largely cosmetic, I wouldn't say it's trivial! So > yes, how about we stick this on a branch at -rc3 and you can build on top > of that? > > It also means you can spin a v3 with the various minor open issues > addressed. That sounds great to me, thanks! I'll wait a few days before sending out a v3 in case there are any other impactful comments. Thanks, Mark. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel