public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Da Xue <da@libre.computer>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: meson-spicc: save pow2 datarate between messages
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 16:27:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvJ84qkuXdvVgXRm@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220809152019.461741-1-narmstrong@baylibre.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 861 bytes --]

On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 05:20:19PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> At the end of a message, the HW gets a reset in meson_spicc_unprepare_transfer(),
> this resets the SPICC_CONREG register and notably the value set by the
> Common Clock Framework.

> This saves the datarate dividor value between message to keep the last
> set value by the Common Clock Framework.

When you say the value set by the clock framework does that mean that
the clock driver is adjusting hardware inside the SPI controller IP
block which is then getting reset by the SPI driver without the SPI
driver knowing about it?  That seems like a bad idea as you're finding
here.

> This didn't appear before commit 3e0cf4d3fc29 ("spi: meson-spicc: add a linear clock divider support")
> because we recalculated and wrote the rate for each xfer.

Note that the rate might change per transfer.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-09 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-09 15:20 [PATCH] spi: meson-spicc: save pow2 datarate between messages Neil Armstrong
2022-08-09 15:27 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2022-08-10  9:17   ` Neil Armstrong
2022-08-10 12:37     ` Mark Brown
2022-08-10 14:01       ` Neil Armstrong
2022-08-10 14:31         ` Mark Brown
2022-08-10 14:40           ` Neil Armstrong
2022-08-10 14:49             ` Mark Brown
2022-08-10 15:51               ` Neil Armstrong
2022-08-10 16:10                 ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YvJ84qkuXdvVgXRm@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=da@libre.computer \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox