From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, arnd@arndb.de,
will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org,
broonie@kernel.org, debian-arm@lists.debian.org,
Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>,
Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>,
Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups for multiword loads
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 18:06:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yw+VMDk6vLMl/qwr@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220701135322.3025321-1-ardb@kernel.org>
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 03:53:22PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> The 32-bit ARM kernel implements fixups on behalf of user space when
> using LDM/STM or LDRD/STRD instructions on addresses that are not 32-bit
> aligned. This is not something that is supported by the architecture,
> but was done anyway to increase compatibility with user space software,
> which mostly targeted x86 at the time and did not care about aligned
> accesses.
>
> This feature is one of the remaining impediments to being able to switch
> to 64-bit kernels on 64-bit capable hardware running 32-bit user space,
> so let's implement it for the arm64 compat layer as well.
>
> Note that the intent is to implement the exact same handling of
> misaligned multi-word loads and stores as the 32-bit kernel does,
> including what appears to be missing support for user space programs
> that rely on SETEND to switch to a different byte order and back. Also,
> like the 32-bit ARM version, we rely on the faulting address reported by
> the CPU to infer the memory address, instead of decoding the instruction
> fully to obtain this information.
>
> This implementation is taken from the 32-bit ARM tree, with all pieces
> removed that deal with instructions other than LDRD/STRD and LDM/STM, or
> that deal with alignment exceptions taken in kernel mode.
>
> Cc: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
> Cc: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>
> Cc: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>
> Cc: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> ---
> Note to cc'ees: if this is something you would like to see merged,
> please indicate so. This stuff is unlikely to get in if there are no
> users.
>
> v2: - drop some obsolete comments
> - emit a perf alignment-fault event for every handled instruction
> - use arm64_skip_faulting_instruction() to get the correct behavior
> wrt IT state and single step
> - use types with correct endianness annotation (instructions are
> always little endian on v7/v8+)
It looks like that's a fairly popular request from people running 32-bit
user on AArch64 kernels, so happy to queue it for 6.1 (if it still
applies cleanly). I'm not too keen on code duplication but it's a lot
more hassle to create a common decoding/emulation library to share with
arch/arm, especially as such code is not going to change in the future.
> +config COMPAT_ALIGNMENT_FIXUPS
> + bool "Fix up misaligned multi-word loads and stores in user space"
> + default y
For consistency with ARMV8_DEPRECATED, I think we should keep this as
default n.
Thanks.
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-31 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-01 13:53 [PATCH v2] arm64: compat: Implement misalignment fixups for multiword loads Ard Biesheuvel
2022-07-01 14:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-07-14 1:52 ` Wookey
2022-08-16 19:28 ` Aurelien Jarno
2022-08-16 20:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-08-17 9:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-08-31 17:06 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2022-09-05 10:04 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-09-05 11:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-06 17:45 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yw+VMDk6vLMl/qwr@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=debian-arm@lists.debian.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=riku.voipio@iki.fi \
--cc=steve@einval.com \
--cc=vagrant@debian.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).