From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Kuyo Chang <kuyo.chang@mediatek.com>
Cc: major.chen@samsung.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
wsd_upstream@mediatek.com, hongfei.tang@samsung.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] sched/debug: fix dentry leak in update_sched_domain_debugfs
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 07:26:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YxGUBzp9C7kcNgps@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220902031518.1116-1-kuyo.chang@mediatek.com>
On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 11:15:15AM +0800, Kuyo Chang wrote:
> From: kuyo chang <kuyo.chang@mediatek.com>
>
> [Syndrome]
> Lowmemorykiller triggered while doing hotplug stress test as below cmd:
> echo [0/1] > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu${index}/online
>
> Rootcause:
> Call trace of the slab owner & usage as below after hotplug stress
> test(4hr).
> There exists dentry leak at update_sched_domain_debugfs.
>
> Total size : 322000KB
> <prep_new_page+44>:
> <get_page_from_freelist+672>:
> <__alloc_pages+304>:
> <allocate_slab+144>:
> <___slab_alloc+404>:
> <__slab_alloc+60>:
> <kmem_cache_alloc+1204>:
> <alloc_inode+100>:
> <new_inode+40>:
> <__debugfs_create_file+172>:
> <update_sched_domain_debugfs+824>:
> <partition_sched_domains_locked+1292>:
> <rebuild_sched_domains_locked+576>:
> <cpuset_hotplug_workfn+1052>:
> <process_one_work+584>:
> <worker_thread+1008>:
>
> [Solution]
> Provided by Major Chen <major.chen@samsung.com> as below link.
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220711030341epcms5p173848e98b13c09eb2fcdf2fd7287526a@epcms5p1/
> update_sched_domain_debugfs() uses debugfs_lookup() to find wanted dentry(which has
> been created by debugfs_create_dir() before), but not call dput() to return this dentry
> back. This result in dentry leak even debugfs_remove() is called.
>
> [Test result]
> Using below commands to check inode_cache & dentry leak.
> cat /proc/slabinfo | grep -w inode_cache
> cat /proc/slabinfo | grep -w dentry
>
> With the patch, the inode_cache & dentry stays consistent
> so the lowmemorykiller will not triggered anymore.
>
> Fixes: 8a99b6833c88 ("sched: Move SCHED_DEBUG sysctl to debugfs")
>
> Signed-off-by: Major Chen <major.chen@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: kuyo chang <kuyo.chang@mediatek.com>
> Tested-by: kuyo chang <kuyo.chang@mediatek.com>
>
> ---
> kernel/sched/debug.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> index bb3d63bdf4ae..4ffea2dc01da 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> @@ -412,11 +412,14 @@ void update_sched_domain_debugfs(void)
>
> for_each_cpu(cpu, sd_sysctl_cpus) {
> struct sched_domain *sd;
> - struct dentry *d_cpu;
> + struct dentry *d_cpu, *d_lookup;
> char buf[32];
>
> snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "cpu%d", cpu);
> - debugfs_remove(debugfs_lookup(buf, sd_dentry));
> + d_lookup = debugfs_lookup(buf, sd_dentry);
> + debugfs_remove(d_lookup);
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(d_lookup))
> + dput(d_lookup);
That's odd, and means that something else is removing this file right
after we looked it up? Is there a missing lock here that should be used
instead?
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-02 5:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-02 3:15 [PATCH 1/1] sched/debug: fix dentry leak in update_sched_domain_debugfs Kuyo Chang
2022-09-02 5:26 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2022-09-02 6:40 ` Kuyo Chang
2022-09-02 6:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-09-02 7:36 ` Kuyo Chang
2022-09-02 9:11 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-09-02 10:47 ` Kuyo Chang
2022-09-02 12:47 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-09-02 14:49 ` Al Viro
2022-09-02 14:56 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YxGUBzp9C7kcNgps@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hongfei.tang@samsung.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kuyo.chang@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=major.chen@samsung.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).