linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Nick Forrington <nick.forrington@arm.com>
Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf vendor events: Add missing Neoverse V1 events
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 16:25:51 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YxJYv0IfvmL1BTrX@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6813a737-736d-7e15-a44f-d800ed9248be@arm.com>

Em Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 03:12:49PM +0100, Nick Forrington escreveu:
> On 02/09/2022 09:04, John Garry wrote:
> > On 01/09/2022 16:18, Nick Forrington wrote:
> > > Based on updated data from:
> > > https://github.com/ARM-software/data/blob/master/pmu/neoverse-v1.json
> > > 
> > > which is based on PMU event descriptions from the Arm Neoverse V1
> > > Technical Reference Manual.
> > > 
> > > This adds the following missing events:
> > > ASE_INST_SPEC
> > > SVE_INST_SPEC
> > > SVE_PRED_SPEC
> > > SVE_PRED_EMPTY_SPEC
> > > SVE_PRED_FULL_SPEC
> > > SVE_PRED_PARTIAL_SPEC
> > > SVE_LDFF_SPEC
> > > SVE_LDFF_FAULT_SPEC
> > > FP_SCALE_OPS_SPEC
> > > FP_FIXED_OPS_SPEC
> > > 
> > > It also moves REMOTE_ACCESS from other.json to memory.json.
> > 
> > Any specific reason why? I see that neoverse n2 and a76-n1 still use
> > "other" json for REMOTE_ACCESS. Nicer to be consistent.
> 
> Thanks John, I agree on consistency.
> 
> I think memory is a better categorisation (for all CPUs), and this is
> consistent with what I submitted for various Cortex CPUs a while back.

Were those patches processed or is some still outstanding?
 
> I'd be happy to remove the REMOTE_ACCESS change here and update (or not)
> REMOTE_ACCESS for Neoverse separately.
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Nick Forrington<nick.forrington@arm.com>
> > > ---
> > 
> > Apart from above:
> > Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
> Thanks, Nick

So, how should we proceed?

- Arnaldo

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-02 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-01 15:18 [PATCH] perf vendor events: Add missing Neoverse V1 events Nick Forrington
2022-09-02  8:04 ` John Garry
2022-09-02 14:12   ` Nick Forrington
2022-09-02 19:25     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2022-09-05  9:25       ` John Garry
2022-09-05 11:19       ` Nick Forrington

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YxJYv0IfvmL1BTrX@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=nick.forrington@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).