From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
ChiaEn Wu <chiaen_wu@richtek.com>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: mt6370: add bounds checking to regmap_read/write functions
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 07:57:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YxmSTH5ETSC0D3Rp@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220822125705.GD2695@kadam>
On Mon, 22 Aug 2022, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 09:27:13AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 8:25 AM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > It looks like there are a potential out of bounds accesses in the
> > > read/write() functions. Also can "len" be negative? Let's check for
> > > that too.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > Fixes: ab9905c5e38e ("mfd: mt6370: Add MediaTek MT6370 support")
> >
> > > From static analysis. This code is obviously harmless however it may
> > > not be required. The regmap range checking is slightly complicated and
> > > I haven't remembered where all it's done.
> >
> > Exactement! I do not think this Fixes anything, I believe you are
> > adding a dead code. So, can you do deeper analysis?
>
> I spent a long time looking at this code before I sent it and I've
> spent a long time looking at it today.
>
> Smatch said that these values come from the user, but now it seems
> less clear to me and I have rebuilt the DB so I don't have the same
> information I was looking at earlier.
>
> So I can't see if these come from the user but neither can I find any
> bounds checking.
What's the consensus please?
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-08 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-19 5:25 [PATCH] mfd: mt6370: add bounds checking to regmap_read/write functions Dan Carpenter
2022-08-19 6:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-08-22 12:57 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-09-08 6:57 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2022-09-08 7:54 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-09-08 10:49 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-09-09 6:59 ` Lee Jones
2022-09-14 1:33 ` ChiYuan Huang
2022-08-23 22:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YxmSTH5ETSC0D3Rp@google.com \
--to=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=chiaen_wu@richtek.com \
--cc=cy_huang@richtek.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).