linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Sauerwein, David" <dssauerw@amazon.de>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm: Introduce for_each_valid_pfn() and use it from reserve_bootmem_region()
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 09:19:14 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-4oYlsAzZ6OQHCH@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250402201841.3245371-1-dwmw2@infradead.org>

On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 09:18:39PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
> 
> Especially since commit 9092d4f7a1f8 ("memblock: update initialization
> of reserved pages"), the reserve_bootmem_region() function can spend a
> significant amount of time iterating over every 4KiB PFN in a range,
> calling pfn_valid() on each one, and ultimately doing absolutely nothing.
> 
> On a platform used for virtualization, with large NOMAP regions that
> eventually get used for guest RAM, this leads to a significant increase
> in steal time experienced during kexec for a live update.
> 
> Introduce for_each_valid_pfn() and use it from reserve_bootmem_region().
> This implementation is precisely the same naïve loop that the function
> used to have, but subsequent commits will provide optimised versions
> for FLATMEM and SPARSEMEM, and this version will remain for those
> architectures which provide their own pfn_valid() implementation,
> until/unless they also provide a matching for_each_valid_pfn().
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>

Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>

> ---
>  include/linux/mmzone.h | 10 ++++++++++
>  mm/mm_init.c           | 23 ++++++++++-------------
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index 25e80b2ca7f4..32ecb5cadbaf 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -2176,6 +2176,16 @@ void sparse_init(void);
>  #define subsection_map_init(_pfn, _nr_pages) do {} while (0)
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SPARSEMEM */
>  
> +/*
> + * Fallback case for when the architecture provides its own pfn_valid() but
> + * not a corresponding for_each_valid_pfn().
> + */
> +#ifndef for_each_valid_pfn
> +#define for_each_valid_pfn(_pfn, _start_pfn, _end_pfn)			\
> +	for ((_pfn) = (_start_pfn); (_pfn) < (_end_pfn); (_pfn)++)	\
> +		if (pfn_valid(_pfn))
> +#endif
> +
>  #endif /* !__GENERATING_BOUNDS.H */
>  #endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
>  #endif /* _LINUX_MMZONE_H */
> diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
> index a38a1909b407..7c699bad42ad 100644
> --- a/mm/mm_init.c
> +++ b/mm/mm_init.c
> @@ -777,22 +777,19 @@ static inline void init_deferred_page(unsigned long pfn, int nid)
>  void __meminit reserve_bootmem_region(phys_addr_t start,
>  				      phys_addr_t end, int nid)
>  {
> -	unsigned long start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(start);
> -	unsigned long end_pfn = PFN_UP(end);
> +	unsigned long pfn;
>  
> -	for (; start_pfn < end_pfn; start_pfn++) {
> -		if (pfn_valid(start_pfn)) {
> -			struct page *page = pfn_to_page(start_pfn);
> +	for_each_valid_pfn (pfn, PFN_DOWN(start), PFN_UP(end)) {
> +		struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>  
> -			init_deferred_page(start_pfn, nid);
> +		init_deferred_page(pfn, nid);
>  
> -			/*
> -			 * no need for atomic set_bit because the struct
> -			 * page is not visible yet so nobody should
> -			 * access it yet.
> -			 */
> -			__SetPageReserved(page);
> -		}
> +		/*
> +		 * no need for atomic set_bit because the struct
> +		 * page is not visible yet so nobody should
> +		 * access it yet.
> +		 */
> +		__SetPageReserved(page);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.49.0
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-03  6:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-11 10:05 [PATCH v4 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] include/linux/mmzone.h: add documentation for pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:22   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] memblock: update initialization of reserved pages Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:23   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-03-31 12:50   ` David Woodhouse
2025-03-31 14:50     ` Mike Rapoport
2025-03-31 15:13       ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-01 11:33         ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-01 11:50           ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-01 13:19             ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-02 20:18               ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm: Introduce for_each_valid_pfn() and use it from reserve_bootmem_region() David Woodhouse
2025-04-02 20:18                 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm: Implement for_each_valid_pfn() for CONFIG_FLATMEM David Woodhouse
2025-04-03  6:19                   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-02 20:18                 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm: Implement for_each_valid_pfn() for CONFIG_SPARSEMEM David Woodhouse
2025-04-03  6:24                   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-03  7:07                     ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-03  7:15                       ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-03 14:13                         ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-03 14:17                           ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-03 14:25                             ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-03 14:10                       ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-03  6:19                 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2021-05-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: decouple check whether pfn is in linear map from pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:25   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:26   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-11 23:40   ` Andrew Morton
2021-05-12  5:31     ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-12  3:13 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] " Kefeng Wang
2021-05-12  7:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-12  7:33   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-12  7:59     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-12  8:32       ` Mike Rapoport

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z-4oYlsAzZ6OQHCH@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dssauerw@amazon.de \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).