From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Sauerwein, David" <dssauerw@amazon.de>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm: Introduce for_each_valid_pfn() and use it from reserve_bootmem_region()
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 09:19:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-4oYlsAzZ6OQHCH@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250402201841.3245371-1-dwmw2@infradead.org>
On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 09:18:39PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
>
> Especially since commit 9092d4f7a1f8 ("memblock: update initialization
> of reserved pages"), the reserve_bootmem_region() function can spend a
> significant amount of time iterating over every 4KiB PFN in a range,
> calling pfn_valid() on each one, and ultimately doing absolutely nothing.
>
> On a platform used for virtualization, with large NOMAP regions that
> eventually get used for guest RAM, this leads to a significant increase
> in steal time experienced during kexec for a live update.
>
> Introduce for_each_valid_pfn() and use it from reserve_bootmem_region().
> This implementation is precisely the same naïve loop that the function
> used to have, but subsequent commits will provide optimised versions
> for FLATMEM and SPARSEMEM, and this version will remain for those
> architectures which provide their own pfn_valid() implementation,
> until/unless they also provide a matching for_each_valid_pfn().
>
> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/linux/mmzone.h | 10 ++++++++++
> mm/mm_init.c | 23 ++++++++++-------------
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index 25e80b2ca7f4..32ecb5cadbaf 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -2176,6 +2176,16 @@ void sparse_init(void);
> #define subsection_map_init(_pfn, _nr_pages) do {} while (0)
> #endif /* CONFIG_SPARSEMEM */
>
> +/*
> + * Fallback case for when the architecture provides its own pfn_valid() but
> + * not a corresponding for_each_valid_pfn().
> + */
> +#ifndef for_each_valid_pfn
> +#define for_each_valid_pfn(_pfn, _start_pfn, _end_pfn) \
> + for ((_pfn) = (_start_pfn); (_pfn) < (_end_pfn); (_pfn)++) \
> + if (pfn_valid(_pfn))
> +#endif
> +
> #endif /* !__GENERATING_BOUNDS.H */
> #endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
> #endif /* _LINUX_MMZONE_H */
> diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
> index a38a1909b407..7c699bad42ad 100644
> --- a/mm/mm_init.c
> +++ b/mm/mm_init.c
> @@ -777,22 +777,19 @@ static inline void init_deferred_page(unsigned long pfn, int nid)
> void __meminit reserve_bootmem_region(phys_addr_t start,
> phys_addr_t end, int nid)
> {
> - unsigned long start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(start);
> - unsigned long end_pfn = PFN_UP(end);
> + unsigned long pfn;
>
> - for (; start_pfn < end_pfn; start_pfn++) {
> - if (pfn_valid(start_pfn)) {
> - struct page *page = pfn_to_page(start_pfn);
> + for_each_valid_pfn (pfn, PFN_DOWN(start), PFN_UP(end)) {
> + struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>
> - init_deferred_page(start_pfn, nid);
> + init_deferred_page(pfn, nid);
>
> - /*
> - * no need for atomic set_bit because the struct
> - * page is not visible yet so nobody should
> - * access it yet.
> - */
> - __SetPageReserved(page);
> - }
> + /*
> + * no need for atomic set_bit because the struct
> + * page is not visible yet so nobody should
> + * access it yet.
> + */
> + __SetPageReserved(page);
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.49.0
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-03 6:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-11 10:05 [PATCH v4 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] include/linux/mmzone.h: add documentation for pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] memblock: update initialization of reserved pages Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-03-31 12:50 ` David Woodhouse
2025-03-31 14:50 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-03-31 15:13 ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-01 11:33 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-01 11:50 ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-01 13:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-02 20:18 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm: Introduce for_each_valid_pfn() and use it from reserve_bootmem_region() David Woodhouse
2025-04-02 20:18 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm: Implement for_each_valid_pfn() for CONFIG_FLATMEM David Woodhouse
2025-04-03 6:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-02 20:18 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm: Implement for_each_valid_pfn() for CONFIG_SPARSEMEM David Woodhouse
2025-04-03 6:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-03 7:07 ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-03 7:15 ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-03 14:13 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-03 14:17 ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-03 14:25 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-03 14:10 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-03 6:19 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2021-05-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: decouple check whether pfn is in linear map from pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-11 23:40 ` Andrew Morton
2021-05-12 5:31 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-12 3:13 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] " Kefeng Wang
2021-05-12 7:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-12 7:33 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-12 7:59 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-12 8:32 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z-4oYlsAzZ6OQHCH@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dssauerw@amazon.de \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).