From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Sauerwein, David" <dssauerw@amazon.de>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm: Implement for_each_valid_pfn() for CONFIG_FLATMEM
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 09:19:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-4of2VHLpZ4Uj4q@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250402201841.3245371-2-dwmw2@infradead.org>
On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 09:18:40PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
>
> In the FLATMEM case, the default pfn_valid() just checks that the PFN is
> within the range [ ARCH_PFN_OFFSET .. ARCH_PFN_OFFSET + max_mapnr ).
>
> The for_each_valid_pfn() function can therefore be a simple for() loop
> using those as min/max respectively.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/asm-generic/memory_model.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h b/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h
> index a3b5029aebbd..4fe7dd3bc09c 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h
> @@ -30,7 +30,31 @@ static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
> return pfn >= pfn_offset && (pfn - pfn_offset) < max_mapnr;
> }
> #define pfn_valid pfn_valid
> -#endif
> +
> +static inline bool first_valid_pfn(unsigned long *pfn)
> +{
> + /* avoid <linux/mm.h> include hell */
> + extern unsigned long max_mapnr;
> + unsigned long pfn_offset = ARCH_PFN_OFFSET;
> +
> + if (*pfn < pfn_offset) {
> + *pfn = pfn_offset;
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + if ((*pfn - pfn_offset) < max_mapnr)
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +#ifndef for_each_valid_pfn
> +#define for_each_valid_pfn(pfn, start_pfn, end_pfn) \
> + for (pfn = max_t(unsigned long start_pfn, ARCH_PFN_OFFSET); \
> + pfn < min_t(unsigned long, end_pfn, ARCH_PFN_OFFSET + max_mapnr); \
> + pfn++)
> +#endif /* for_each_valid_pfn */
> +#endif /* valid_pfn */
>
> #elif defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP)
>
> --
> 2.49.0
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-03 6:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-11 10:05 [PATCH v4 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] include/linux/mmzone.h: add documentation for pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] memblock: update initialization of reserved pages Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-03-31 12:50 ` David Woodhouse
2025-03-31 14:50 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-03-31 15:13 ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-01 11:33 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-01 11:50 ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-01 13:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-02 20:18 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm: Introduce for_each_valid_pfn() and use it from reserve_bootmem_region() David Woodhouse
2025-04-02 20:18 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm: Implement for_each_valid_pfn() for CONFIG_FLATMEM David Woodhouse
2025-04-03 6:19 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2025-04-02 20:18 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm: Implement for_each_valid_pfn() for CONFIG_SPARSEMEM David Woodhouse
2025-04-03 6:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-03 7:07 ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-03 7:15 ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-03 14:13 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-03 14:17 ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-03 14:25 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-03 14:10 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-03 6:19 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm: Introduce for_each_valid_pfn() and use it from reserve_bootmem_region() Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: decouple check whether pfn is in linear map from pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-11 23:40 ` Andrew Morton
2021-05-12 5:31 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-12 3:13 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] " Kefeng Wang
2021-05-12 7:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-12 7:33 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-12 7:59 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-12 8:32 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z-4of2VHLpZ4Uj4q@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dssauerw@amazon.de \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).