From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Sauerwein, David" <dssauerw@amazon.de>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] memblock: update initialization of reserved pages
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 17:50:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-qrtJ6cs-kXpepR@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9f33c0b4517eaf5f36c515b92bdcb6170a4a576a.camel@infradead.org>
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 01:50:33PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-05-11 at 13:05 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> >
> > +static void __init memmap_init_reserved_pages(void)
> > +{
> > + struct memblock_region *region;
> > + phys_addr_t start, end;
> > + u64 i;
> > +
> > + /* initialize struct pages for the reserved regions */
> > + for_each_reserved_mem_range(i, &start, &end)
> > + reserve_bootmem_region(start, end);
> > +
> > + /* and also treat struct pages for the NOMAP regions as PageReserved */
> > + for_each_mem_region(region) {
> > + if (memblock_is_nomap(region)) {
> > + start = region->base;
> > + end = start + region->size;
> > + reserve_bootmem_region(start, end);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
>
> In some cases, that whole call to reserve_bootmem_region() may be a no-
> op because pfn_valid() is not true for *any* address in that range.
>
> But reserve_bootmem_region() spends a long time iterating of them all,
> and eventually doing nothing:
>
> void __meminit reserve_bootmem_region(phys_addr_t start,
> phys_addr_t end, int nid)
> {
> unsigned long start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(start);
> unsigned long end_pfn = PFN_UP(end);
>
> for (; start_pfn < end_pfn; start_pfn++) {
> if (pfn_valid(start_pfn)) {
> struct page *page = pfn_to_page(start_pfn);
>
> init_reserved_page(start_pfn, nid);
>
> /*
> * no need for atomic set_bit because the struct
> * page is not visible yet so nobody should
> * access it yet.
> */
> __SetPageReserved(page);
> }
> }
> }
>
> On platforms with large NOMAP regions (e.g. which are actually reserved
> for guest memory to keep it out of the Linux address map and allow for
> kexec-based live update of the hypervisor), this pointless loop ends up
> taking a significant amount of time which is visible as guest steal
> time during the live update.
>
> Can reserve_bootmem_region() skip the loop *completely* if no PFN in
> the range from start to end is valid? Or tweak the loop itself to have
> an 'else' case which skips to the next valid PFN? Something like
>
> for(...) {
> if (pfn_valid(start_pfn)) {
> ...
> } else {
> start_pfn = next_valid_pfn(start_pfn);
> }
> }
My understanding is that you have large reserved NOMAP ranges that don't
appear as memory at all, so no memory map for them is created and so
pfn_valid() is false for pfns in those ranges.
If this is the case one way indeed would be to make
reserve_bootmem_region() skip ranges with no valid pfns.
Another way could be to memblock_reserved_mark_noinit() such ranges and
then reserve_bootmem_region() won't even get called, but that would require
firmware to pass that information somehow.
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-31 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-11 10:05 [PATCH v4 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] include/linux/mmzone.h: add documentation for pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] memblock: update initialization of reserved pages Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-03-31 12:50 ` David Woodhouse
2025-03-31 14:50 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2025-03-31 15:13 ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-01 11:33 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-01 11:50 ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-01 13:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-02 20:18 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm: Introduce for_each_valid_pfn() and use it from reserve_bootmem_region() David Woodhouse
2025-04-02 20:18 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm: Implement for_each_valid_pfn() for CONFIG_FLATMEM David Woodhouse
2025-04-03 6:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-02 20:18 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm: Implement for_each_valid_pfn() for CONFIG_SPARSEMEM David Woodhouse
2025-04-03 6:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-03 7:07 ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-03 7:15 ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-03 14:13 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-03 14:17 ` David Woodhouse
2025-04-03 14:25 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-03 14:10 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-04-03 6:19 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm: Introduce for_each_valid_pfn() and use it from reserve_bootmem_region() Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: decouple check whether pfn is in linear map from pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-11 23:40 ` Andrew Morton
2021-05-12 5:31 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-12 3:13 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] " Kefeng Wang
2021-05-12 7:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-12 7:33 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-12 7:59 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-12 8:32 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z-qrtJ6cs-kXpepR@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dssauerw@amazon.de \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).