public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	Gene Chen <gene_chen@richtek.com>,
	Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
	Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] leds: switch to device_for_each_child_node_scoped()
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:29:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z0ItIQWHOGL-GTi8@surfacebook.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240927-leds_device_for_each_child_node_scoped-v1-0-95c0614b38c8@gmail.com>

Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 01:20:51AM +0200, Javier Carrasco kirjoitti:
> This series switches from the device_for_each_child_node() macro to its
> scoped variant, which in general makes the code more robust if new early
> exits are added to the loops, because there is no need for explicit
> calls to fwnode_handle_put(). Depending on the complexity of the loop
> and its error handling, the code gets simplified and it gets easier to
> follow.
> 
> The non-scoped variant of the macro is error-prone, and it has been the
> source of multiple bugs where the child node refcount was not
> decremented accordingly in error paths within the loops. The first patch
> of this series is a good example, which fixes that kind of bug that is
> regularly found in node iterators.
> 
> The uses of device_for_each_child_node() with no early exits have been
> left untouched because their simpilicty justifies the non-scoped
> variant.
> 
> Note that the child node is now declared in the macro, and therefore the
> explicit declaration is no longer required.
> 
> The general functionality should not be affected by this modification.
> If functional changes are found, please report them back as errors.


Thank you for this series. It may now benefit from the next steps:

1) converting to return dev_err_probe() or dev_warn_probe() directly since
   the goto had been replaced by direct return, hence saving even more LoCs;

2) dropping or refactoring the complex conditions due to your nice series
   being applied.

I'll comment individually on some to show what I meant by the above.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko




      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-23 19:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-26 23:20 [PATCH 00/18] leds: switch to device_for_each_child_node_scoped() Javier Carrasco
2024-09-26 23:20 ` [PATCH 01/18] leds: flash: mt6360: fix device_for_each_child_node() refcounting in error paths Javier Carrasco
2024-09-26 23:20 ` [PATCH 02/18] leds: flash: mt6370: switch to device_for_each_child_node_scoped() Javier Carrasco
2024-09-26 23:20 ` [PATCH 03/18] leds: flash: leds-qcom-flash: " Javier Carrasco
2024-09-26 23:20 ` [PATCH 04/18] leds: aw200xx: " Javier Carrasco
2024-09-26 23:20 ` [PATCH 05/18] leds: cr0014114: " Javier Carrasco
2024-11-23 19:31   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-26 23:20 ` [PATCH 06/18] leds: el15203000: " Javier Carrasco
2024-11-23 19:34   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-26 23:20 ` [PATCH 07/18] leds: gpio: " Javier Carrasco
2024-11-23 19:35   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-26 23:20 ` [PATCH 08/18] leds: lm3532: " Javier Carrasco
2024-11-23 19:37   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-26 23:21 ` [PATCH 09/18] leds: lm3697: " Javier Carrasco
2024-11-23 19:37   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-26 23:21 ` [PATCH 10/18] leds: lp50xx: " Javier Carrasco
2024-09-26 23:21 ` [PATCH 11/18] leds: max77650: " Javier Carrasco
2024-09-27  6:36   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-11-23 19:47   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-26 23:21 ` [PATCH 12/18] leds: ns2: " Javier Carrasco
2024-09-26 23:21 ` [PATCH 13/18] leds: pca963x: " Javier Carrasco
2024-11-23 19:45   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-26 23:21 ` [PATCH 14/18] leds: pwm: " Javier Carrasco
2024-09-26 23:21 ` [PATCH 15/18] leds: sun50i-a100: " Javier Carrasco
2024-11-23 19:41   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-26 23:21 ` [PATCH 16/18] leds: tca6507: " Javier Carrasco
2024-11-23 19:40   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-26 23:21 ` [PATCH 17/18] leds: rgb: ktd202x: " Javier Carrasco
2024-09-26 23:21 ` [PATCH 18/18] leds: rgb: mt6370: " Javier Carrasco
2024-10-09 14:20 ` [PATCH 00/18] leds: " Lee Jones
2024-11-23 19:29 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z0ItIQWHOGL-GTi8@surfacebook.localdomain \
    --to=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=gene_chen@richtek.com \
    --cc=jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com \
    --cc=javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=samuel@sholland.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox