linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Fix S1/S2 combination when FWB==1 and S2 has Device memory type
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 07:27:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z0XoxGSWRCjbTFie@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241125094756.609590-1-maz@kernel.org>

On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 09:47:56AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> The G.a revision of the ARM ARM had it pretty clear that HCR_EL2.FWB
> had no influence on "The way that stage 1 memory types and attributes
> are combined with stage 2 Device type and attributes." (D5.5.5).
> 
> However, this wording was lost in further revisions of the architecture.
> 
> Restore the intended behaviour, which is to take the strongest memory
> type of S1 and S2 in this case, as if FWB was 0. The specification is
> being fixed accordingly.

Since you're already asking for a spec fix, could you mention that the
column headers in DDI0487K.a Table D8-95 are incorrect? MemAttr[1:0] is
used twice, although I believe the first column is actually MemAttr[3:2].

> Fixes: be04cebf3e788 ("KVM: arm64: nv: Add emulation of AT S12E{0,1}{R,W}")
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/at.c | 11 +++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
> index 8c5d7990e5b31..98cb499fa4b11 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
> @@ -739,8 +739,15 @@ static u64 compute_par_s12(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 s1_par,
>  			final_attr = s1_parattr;
>  			break;
>  		default:
> -			/* MemAttr[2]=0, Device from S2 */
> -			final_attr = s2_memattr & GENMASK(1,0) << 2;
> +			/*
> +			 * MemAttr[2]=0, Device from S2.
> +			 *
> +			 * FWB does not influence the way that stage 1
> + 			 * memory types and attributes are combined
> + 			 * with stage 2 Device type and attributes.
> +			 */
> +			final_attr = min(s2_memattr_to_attr(s2_memattr),
> +					 s1_parattr);

Otherwise, LGTM.

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver


  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-26 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-25  9:47 [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Fix S1/S2 combination when FWB==1 and S2 has Device memory type Marc Zyngier
2024-11-26 15:27 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2024-11-26 16:30   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-11-26 18:48     ` Oliver Upton
2024-11-26 15:59 ` Oliver Upton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z0XoxGSWRCjbTFie@linux.dev \
    --to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).