From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Keisuke Nishimura <keisuke.nishimura@inria.fr>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Add error handling in vgic_its_cache_translation
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 09:55:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z0iujBMl1ypdwfBu@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241128134534.361144-1-keisuke.nishimura@inria.fr>
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 02:45:34PM +0100, Keisuke Nishimura wrote:
> The xa_store() may fail because there is no guarantee that the cache_key
> index is already used in its->translation_cache. This fix (1) resolves
> the kref inconsistency on failure and (2) returns the error code.
xa_store() doesn't fail if an entry is already present at the specified
index. It returns the old entry, which is why we have a vgic_put_irq()
on the "error" path.
Genuine error handling definitely is missing here, but that would only
happen if the xarray library failed to allocate (-ENOMEM) or if the
xarray itself is broken beyond repair (-EINVAL).
> Fixes: 8201d1028caa ("KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Maintain a translation cache per ITS")
> Signed-off-by: Keisuke Nishimura <keisuke.nishimura@inria.fr>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> index 198296933e7e..8f423857b7d2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> @@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_its_check_cache(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t db,
> return irq;
> }
>
> -static void vgic_its_cache_translation(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
> +static int vgic_its_cache_translation(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
> u32 devid, u32 eventid,
> struct vgic_irq *irq)
This was deliberately made a void return. The entire translation cache
is opportunistic and not required for functional correctness. Nothing
breaks if we fail to insert an entry for, say, a failed memory
allocation.
It would be extremely helpful if you could share the steps to reproduce
the error you observe.
--
Thanks,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-28 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-28 13:45 [PATCH] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Add error handling in vgic_its_cache_translation Keisuke Nishimura
2024-11-28 16:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-11-28 17:55 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2024-11-28 19:04 ` Keisuke Nishimura
2024-11-29 7:20 ` Oliver Upton
2024-11-29 11:30 ` Keisuke Nishimura
2024-11-29 16:33 ` Oliver Upton
2024-11-29 16:59 ` Keisuke Nishimura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z0iujBMl1ypdwfBu@linux.dev \
--to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=keisuke.nishimura@inria.fr \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).