Re: [PATCH v2] arch_numa: Restore nid checks before registering a memblock with a node

[Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>]

Hi Marc,

On Sun, Dec 01, 2024 at 09:27:02AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Commit 767507654c22 ("arch_numa: switch over to numa_memblks")
> significantly cleaned up the NUMA registration code, but also
> dropped a significant check that was refusing to accept to
> configure a memblock with an invalid nid.

... 
 
> while previous kernel versions were able to recognise how brain-damaged
> the machine is, and only build a fake node.
> 
> Use the memblock_validate_numa_coverage() helper to restore some sanity
> and a "working" system.
> 
> Fixes: 767507654c22 ("arch_numa: switch over to numa_memblks")
> Suggested-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> index e187016764265..c63a72a1fed64 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> @@ -208,6 +208,10 @@ static int __init numa_register_nodes(void)
>  {
>  	int nid;
>  
> +	/* Check the validity of the memblock/node mapping */
> +	if (!memblock_validate_numa_coverage(1))

I've changed this to memblock_validate_numa_coverage(0) and applied along
with my patch that changed memblock_validate_numa_coverage() to work with
0:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/memblock.git/log/?h=thunderx-fix

Can you please verify that it works on your "quality hardware"?

> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	/* Finally register nodes. */
>  	for_each_node_mask(nid, numa_nodes_parsed) {
>  		unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
> -- 
> 2.39.2

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.