From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
To: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, james.clark@linaro.org,
will@kernel.org, joey.gouly@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
broonie@kernel.org, kristina.martsenko@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/14] KVM: arm64: Initialize feature id registers for protected VMs
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 17:13:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z1MwuSh6jc94cem0@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241202154742.3611749-6-tabba@google.com>
On Monday 02 Dec 2024 at 15:47:32 (+0000), Fuad Tabba wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c
> index 59fb2f056177..1261da6a2861 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/sys_regs.c
> @@ -204,8 +204,7 @@ static u64 get_pvm_id_aa64mmfr2(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return id_aa64mmfr2_el1_sys_val & PVM_ID_AA64MMFR2_ALLOW;
> }
>
> -/* Read a sanitized cpufeature ID register by its encoding */
> -u64 pvm_read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 id)
> +static u64 pvm_calc_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 id)
> {
> switch (id) {
> case SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1:
> @@ -240,10 +239,25 @@ u64 pvm_read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 id)
> }
> }
>
> +/* Read a sanitized cpufeature ID register by its encoding */
> +u64 pvm_read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 id)
> +{
> + return pvm_calc_id_reg(vcpu, id);
> +}
That wrapper doesn't look particularly useful, perhaps we could drop it?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-06 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-02 15:47 [PATCH v4 00/14] KVM: arm64: Rework guest VM fixed feature handling and trapping in pKVM Fuad Tabba
2024-12-02 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 01/14] KVM: arm64: Consolidate allowed and restricted VM feature checks Fuad Tabba
2024-12-06 16:12 ` Quentin Perret
2024-12-09 8:03 ` Fuad Tabba
2024-12-02 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 02/14] KVM: arm64: Group setting traps for protected VMs by control register Fuad Tabba
2024-12-06 16:44 ` Quentin Perret
2024-12-09 8:06 ` Fuad Tabba
2024-12-02 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 03/14] KVM: arm64: Move checking protected vcpu features to a separate function Fuad Tabba
2024-12-02 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 04/14] KVM: arm64: Use KVM extension checks for allowed protected VM capabilities Fuad Tabba
2024-12-06 17:10 ` Quentin Perret
2024-12-09 8:14 ` Fuad Tabba
2024-12-11 13:29 ` Quentin Perret
2024-12-11 13:30 ` Fuad Tabba
2024-12-02 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 05/14] KVM: arm64: Initialize feature id registers for protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2024-12-06 1:02 ` Oliver Upton
2024-12-06 10:04 ` Fuad Tabba
2024-12-06 17:13 ` Quentin Perret [this message]
2024-12-09 8:09 ` Fuad Tabba
2024-12-02 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 06/14] KVM: arm64: Set protected VM traps based on its view of feature registers Fuad Tabba
2024-12-06 17:31 ` Quentin Perret
2024-12-06 17:43 ` Mark Brown
2024-12-06 18:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-12-09 8:11 ` Fuad Tabba
2024-12-02 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 07/14] KVM: arm64: Rework specifying restricted features for protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2024-12-11 12:34 ` Quentin Perret
2024-12-11 13:11 ` Fuad Tabba
2024-12-02 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 08/14] KVM: arm64: Remove fixed_config.h header Fuad Tabba
2024-12-02 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 09/14] KVM: arm64: Remove redundant setting of HCR_EL2 trap bit Fuad Tabba
2024-12-11 12:38 ` Quentin Perret
2024-12-11 12:52 ` Fuad Tabba
2024-12-02 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 10/14] KVM: arm64: Calculate cptr_el2 traps on activating traps Fuad Tabba
2024-12-11 12:46 ` Quentin Perret
2024-12-11 12:55 ` Fuad Tabba
2024-12-02 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 11/14] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_reset_cptr_el2() Fuad Tabba
2024-12-02 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 12/14] KVM: arm64: Fix the value of the CPTR_EL2 RES1 bitmask for nVHE Fuad Tabba
2024-12-02 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 13/14] KVM: arm64: Remove PtrAuth guest vcpu flag Fuad Tabba
2024-12-02 15:47 ` [PATCH v4 14/14] KVM: arm64: Convert the SVE guest vcpu flag to a vm flag Fuad Tabba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z1MwuSh6jc94cem0@google.com \
--to=qperret@google.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).