From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71EC2E7717F for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 08:52:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=B9Gi2lbBe8f7wfuW3GwYiZMF6A9fJI+RtqlNyAWo58E=; b=W+o2myF6+KmckwSFMmd53ojpbi QRJ8vv4sGmjVyYPos7iDgeRHLoZsTUIklKDilBp+SsDdNO5pf4ovEASuZ2qLUoc3u0b3KYhrRInoy oTETi26pnBwBxff3+h8exe5ZWZEoAo1dlMtZrMHm0e0woqCNQyN8bhcIh1rnG4GzqMms+slRfMJG8 2BPx5Gv4TI2Y+g7yFVFScDWd4R/9tRyz+OUW6movr9DcaZAdHpfRUepdBuOhuCSI1eXhCCkErggmz zlywiXhFFnMTLhpVV/3k5Lk9ry+2Zux6Low3XmxSmb23AclQjQKjLUdC0QUh832wxIh2oNDZ5OgSa e/XvtuNA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tN6q2-00000009SLF-0vYJ; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 08:52:26 +0000 Received: from desiato.infradead.org ([2001:8b0:10b:1:d65d:64ff:fe57:4e05]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tN6oU-00000009SD4-0pOd for linux-arm-kernel@bombadil.infradead.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 08:50:50 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=B9Gi2lbBe8f7wfuW3GwYiZMF6A9fJI+RtqlNyAWo58E=; b=csVngC2lNbKoIP12izDa/11ndm vunxNcB54Et2DIYFMmmEqdWZgqQ5JM6wubxmjbB2nFENu47s3EUXSBlRXLjSVdY9etjPRoZuN9QwF uAGupBOh2keJeOv1460xpkgF1NB/XRwGhXuDXBMNL2xOZ1LnUAINW/yT+VGshwD+0Z7D5o2bAmL8I vL3C01IneZHnbZiQD2HNDhKKH6Vq1s/wek2VmIFsSRRX8Gu3ESiN6NQ+pu76cW8BgNRijAcJrN2td LOvkYqdnqDLt6yessoBm4TdBf070Rsc941mOzGvCdu56FylH0noLKmwc3cpr2D2nkyFX2tQ8RODGr 8U8yiKKA==; Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tN6oQ-00000004nyA-1edD for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 08:50:48 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D7B1113E; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:51:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from pluto (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6F463F720; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 00:50:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 08:50:26 +0000 From: Cristian Marussi To: guomin_chen@sina.com Cc: Sudeep Holla , Cristian Marussi , Xinqi Zhang , guomin chen , arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, dan.carpenter@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] firmware: arm_scmi: Delete the meaningless scmi_bus_id. Message-ID: References: <20241216073745.2973317-1-guomin_chen@sina.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241216073745.2973317-1-guomin_chen@sina.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241216_085046_885805_0CCE4B67 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.03 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 03:37:45PM +0800, guomin_chen@sina.com wrote: > From: guomin chen > > Currently, scmi_bus_id is only used to set scmi_dev.id, > which in turn sets the SCMI device name. After removing > scmi_bus_id, it is clearer and more meaningful to directly > use the unique tuple [Parent name,device name, protocol] to > set the SCMI device name. > Hi Guomin, this same pTCH was NACKed(Rejected) a few days ago: https://lore.kernel.org/arm-scmi/20241211134505.2218386-1-guomin_chen@sina.com/T/#u ...and you agreed that is not a simplification we can do (not to break multuple instances...)... ..so why you are posting V2 now ? Thanks, Cristian > Signed-off-by: guomin chen > --- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c | 17 +++-------------- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c > index 157172a5f2b5..800e8ec9357c 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c > @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@ > BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(scmi_requested_devices_nh); > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(scmi_requested_devices_nh); > > -static DEFINE_IDA(scmi_bus_id); > > static DEFINE_IDR(scmi_requested_devices); > /* Protect access to scmi_requested_devices */ > @@ -341,7 +340,6 @@ static void __scmi_device_destroy(struct scmi_device *scmi_dev) > if (scmi_dev->protocol_id == SCMI_PROTOCOL_SYSTEM) > atomic_set(&scmi_syspower_registered, 0); > > - ida_free(&scmi_bus_id, scmi_dev->id); > device_unregister(&scmi_dev->dev); > } > > @@ -349,7 +347,7 @@ static struct scmi_device * > __scmi_device_create(struct device_node *np, struct device *parent, > int protocol, const char *name) > { > - int id, retval; > + int retval; > struct scmi_device *scmi_dev; > > /* > @@ -387,20 +385,13 @@ __scmi_device_create(struct device_node *np, struct device *parent, > return NULL; > } > > - id = ida_alloc_min(&scmi_bus_id, 1, GFP_KERNEL); > - if (id < 0) { > - kfree_const(scmi_dev->name); > - kfree(scmi_dev); > - return NULL; > - } > - > - scmi_dev->id = id; > scmi_dev->protocol_id = protocol; > scmi_dev->dev.parent = parent; > device_set_node(&scmi_dev->dev, of_fwnode_handle(np)); > scmi_dev->dev.bus = &scmi_bus_type; > scmi_dev->dev.release = scmi_device_release; > - dev_set_name(&scmi_dev->dev, "scmi_dev.%d", id); > + dev_set_name(&scmi_dev->dev, "scmi_dev.%s.%s.%d", dev_name(parent), > + scmi_dev->name, protocol); > > retval = device_register(&scmi_dev->dev); > if (retval) > @@ -413,7 +404,6 @@ __scmi_device_create(struct device_node *np, struct device *parent, > return scmi_dev; > put_dev: > put_device(&scmi_dev->dev); > - ida_free(&scmi_bus_id, id); > return NULL; > } > > @@ -526,7 +516,6 @@ static void __exit scmi_bus_exit(void) > */ > scmi_devices_unregister(); > bus_unregister(&scmi_bus_type); > - ida_destroy(&scmi_bus_id); > } > module_exit(scmi_bus_exit); > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > index 1b5fb2c4ce86..bbf1f05f2be3 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > @@ -2641,8 +2641,8 @@ static int scmi_chan_setup(struct scmi_info *info, struct device_node *of_node, > cinfo->max_msg_size = info->desc->max_msg_size; > > /* Create a unique name for this transport device */ > - snprintf(name, 32, "__scmi_transport_device_%s_%02X", > - idx ? "rx" : "tx", prot_id); > + snprintf(name, 32, "__scmi_transport_device_%s", > + idx ? "rx" : "tx"); > /* Create a uniquely named, dedicated transport device for this chan */ > tdev = scmi_device_create(of_node, info->dev, prot_id, name); > if (!tdev) { > -- > 2.47.1 >