From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 802A0E7717D for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 08:48:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=6At0GdwrBbQRQtGqN9J/OMjpky8vIXhTBbHz6TrbWzE=; b=3c/CiNtOhjTYj1k0PYemgeGLbp eCespGUUxtE5ajaoJYAeFpqIyqjZDtQvqIHuYuhSoHDgpLthfwmt5K+LZVt0C0fRJByYG1ufPy6Pc UmPvRmUY68u3BpGTBEp6jC5LnfY89LGQOqBsnTmEtZp/oTvMSXw0kxqieoCQQS5sdt2GqZDq8RLMj Y5T5NrWPFkqF+GjRXObyFE9+VgyKzr0uE5VUy3sc3HH4BgKtPL1MYqF0oYhyshnQ9RJjEb9eMLZrd WPWJwJUXKjswoHtw15/xW1SpgQt6EubNuVjhragDyS21PdZu1CBqrOYdKrN7cSnBsBvXyX0v3w3n/ jb7t+adg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tKZR1-00000006yvI-2CnQ; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 08:48:07 +0000 Received: from mail-m16.yeah.net ([1.95.21.16]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tKZPz-00000006ymP-1shC for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 08:47:05 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yeah.net; s=s110527; h=Date:From:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; bh=6At0GdwrBbQRQtGqN9J/OMjpky8vIXhTBbHz6TrbWzE=; b=lPkb5FsQmQQdQWYcOzNMDtKfRo1KvT3RUdQ65WJyafYZMQH73wbDb4z/tBVvXp EPf7uwabkJEdy02G4PoQDCh2m0gVWNxAAgU1Bx319nuoUnhIhRrY5ndrT1KBNsAt janG84vU51iRqBU7JeilP008ItQrUcHMePQOX294kZG0A= Received: from dragon (unknown []) by gzsmtp2 (Coremail) with SMTP id Ms8vCgAXPuxxrlZnKVSNBA--.47957S3; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 16:46:43 +0800 (CST) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 16:46:41 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Lukasz Majewski Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Wahren Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/3] ARM: dts: mxs: Add descriptions for imx287 based btt3-[012] devices Message-ID: References: <20241107085705.490940-1-lukma@denx.de> <20241107085705.490940-3-lukma@denx.de> <20241119165236.69438f75@wsk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241119165236.69438f75@wsk> X-CM-TRANSID: Ms8vCgAXPuxxrlZnKVSNBA--.47957S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUU8529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxU4CD7UUUUU X-Originating-IP: [114.218.218.187] X-CM-SenderInfo: pvkd40hjxrjqh1hdxhhqhw/1tbiAgiwZWdWlR95wQAAsc X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241209_004703_794071_7875292F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.24 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 04:52:36PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Dear Community, > > > The btt3 device' HW revisions from 0 to 2 use imx287 SoC and are to > > some extend similar to already upstreamed XEA devices, hence are > > using common imx28-lwe.dtsi file. > > > > New, imx28-btt3.dtsi has been added to embrace common DTS > > properties for different HW revisions for this device. > > > > As a result - changes introduced in imx28-btt3-[012].dts are > > minimal. > > > > Are there any more comments / suggestions for this patch set? Patch #2 and #3 look good to me. That said, I'm waiting #1 to be applied first. Shawn