From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A704FE7717F for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 15:01:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=szuDD/3h4LKVK+iQXuffkBdE1gCpSlGTfwZb0zE9lw0=; b=tQw5EtcGpPT9XRNrZFUQm97Wai ZtjrIenD3lRD2e2kgtwQHkKOVLf8Fbo4RIiu7xAK3Ct3nRE9XD8WBEpweod9qCPK49knRgCOII/gp Wr1eP3RWffklGZJzwN+4iMRI6KOgY4DqAeRZ0UREYRh1fxstYkVGAFYjAnivCeHmIJmM4VTD5N4DR 9ERxVhQSN+Wx/qz3q+z5MvEmCSRGyt/Snd+hEKrzuVLfwAZguqWlhh7D+KuLXKwndBhLysjlSyBhx EIWqxy1HVRHfOmHG+JY4Cx7HkA0O1fkXTzbXSXzSNYQopqiX/N4bK6DQvz/cs/VE+7vCE3J1fB66M 5QOGx1zg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tNCas-0000000AKxn-1zAt; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 15:01:10 +0000 Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:45d1:ec00::3]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tNCZ1-0000000AKZj-3kWe for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 14:59:17 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA51EA4150D; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 14:57:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 194C5C4CED0; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 14:59:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1734361154; bh=CnvCaWfgDwIgWkQpCmUclLH+JSJGlMt1flV6kcuDogg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=tpUw+ffutRGge33RcZNfYtcrP4tvXIGpc2EocSBMRUa3L0AKfWgSvhR4xUJuAjG2L JYuVLSdn4gSFYNJ+hVPasm9euCexo1DmxJet8DCJEn7/FboftWcrwgogu5WsUBwmP7 UmG3dh8jisxi6QzFn/u9yS8pYU6MAVpw0wpeNW615w175U8G3dQYEgztV8KASfe1QH aM5eDBV7FtIOk5Nq8zZv50Ye+NJAvVaJ5l0y2UjbCmFjwAuYqu04x9Ay8J41ZKE1/A fye1EBBDzjFEVlXLnuAUc5MQ4mADgp4Ug7mr8K+I0UjoLsviGbBY630gMhoaLeG2+/ zKZ448pI4jznQ== Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 09:59:12 -0500 From: Sasha Levin To: Mark Rutland Cc: Catalin Marinas , Linus Torvalds , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64 fixes for 6.13-rc3 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241216_065915_991427_CF0C93A7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.65 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 10:02:34AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: >On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 12:06:19PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 05:41:38PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: >> > - arm64 stacktrace: address some fallout from the recent changes to >> > unwinding across exception boundaries >> >> Hi Catalin, Mark, >> >> It seems that kselftests can hit a warning that was addressed in the >> commit above: > >I assume you're referring to commit: > > 32ed1205682ec42a ("arm64: stacktrace: Skip reporting LR at exception boundaries") > >... ? I was actually thinking 65ac33bed8b9 ("arm64: stacktrace: Don't WARN when unwinding other tasks"), sorry for the confusion >That was intended to fix this specific issue, as explained in the commit >message (with a very similar splat from running the ftrace kselftests). > >Am I missing something? i.e. are you saying it *doesn't* fix that? Right - LKFT is able to trigger the warning I copied on Linus's tree. -- Thanks, Sasha