From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7EEDE77187 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 11:10:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=dVmmteTH5HJmiV06ONEEcP4hGxtq/aqul7G3lNsssoY=; b=vFpOfUcuEocvB4g+xjDnVwkrDT jUU9K2CohrxHvMky19hyOWAoGwhiO0YqT+st996Dx80Qb1kXFWCLg0MpSsB5yRxQmZ8gF7sBNMdoV ZVdGFseBRpY/Bd7pqmbzFlGnXrhxO4vu/XJKkrI/gmA37pxYAG8/p6I6V6EpOt6bT84/nWyFXnIx5 qDwWpBVD/Yic7yZIfuPNu3WHyFink/d43evHT9j2J52ma9aus+gk5Cuz6Asg0FAlbB9FMklsNqXSi eU8BbtMyB8xw4QV6K9g9tsIm1/LzObT0OJ66CYnqEPxlluS+IQxektd2LrXcjLs8Sx/oyj1ygLK/J q2V4lYKg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tNrwQ-0000000GOmy-0CNJ; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 11:10:10 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::332]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tNrsz-0000000GOGU-23mt for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 11:06:38 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-436345cc17bso34164285e9.0 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 03:06:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; t=1734519995; x=1735124795; darn=lists.infradead.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dVmmteTH5HJmiV06ONEEcP4hGxtq/aqul7G3lNsssoY=; b=Pbsbd2KIN+Q9AXvCre4H0bbIINr/0lmfmcg2baW0w4/mYLjr0qzriW7eknrQug6YtS c2O3UWbJ4eMY3PckZUIsZS8urtD1Wu+gLRoB/eotlHFTl6tYWy8vtRZyXCsgJ4rhY68X H7dr5TwGmP1PbDJS4rbf1oQhRnyVmkLt5Zw40= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1734519995; x=1735124795; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dVmmteTH5HJmiV06ONEEcP4hGxtq/aqul7G3lNsssoY=; b=o5ZM1jZHIZt12AzJm35F613M1pQrqYBgQ7H/3e966xbvXWzGjripOF1VNxNJRBHppv km+Q77ed6iULXRl7SUIfCk3FrBwfGduZhcZXJrXKFG0jh2kRels0DWgkkhH8IwWniFM1 siyP/Ugs4ezcayJ9ItFjanv2CFSrPQybXRhefBtM6IfkvOT5RjbE0T1IooAIh5FPaiOX DdJ932yWawXysIYqFJxjeACNayc1nvy9SaFVV9zc7UrfA3kJnVvXKz71j543VWIzvW0u HCflIL4+i8aD7M88SuXk/X5zzn/fgA1vDPf/ob2R3Rvi5PdWClV50k2dvMyu5TG2QPIW 4bPg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU1JeR9vpVHP5eoJ8OUdSlvwehGK2zJAVMMaPOEILFeluvrIV/AHW7rRXpL6P99XoWfTiJo5BfQJ+plW1VJi3qY@lists.infradead.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwVbn+ZkzTcI5VvbKF2lewP9T7YquQQ7rcazEEPfUyBcfAWAbJd SL9/k4ndYA9kp+U4gDhYhLYwe3PAAF7tNTI09Hwu0bmaE1G+l3/aHV3yDnfSJBs= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncve7cZMjW2HM31NzNvL53gcyZSOBzRVXwc6O6x1x2dBkBQzeOBHvFHkv8A2rov LjifvYnctJePGXi8ZDvFQUtrRI+CaC9j3lR4Xr4x0QfFC1AmF61Vi1cxK7aMUA+tNHKiCsbqJNe nKNtD5rM4kqRu1pWr9bh/hbMFWfjUyf1hbluWo9GcURb6L6DQfKQl84IZ+2IooDy67iXZc/mqns t7DBhJFLMedrzE/nUo1R2UOQfxPaX/zutPmh1Up5eDkCOFBmD9opw/hcoCI2Vq3uEzR X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGO+lveh3Jbb8AZu1Ge8phdM2oV+2GRJ4PUelkWtjliAilPaysJVfHfANDTcu/J9rlhBMtD5Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1ac8:b0:385:f9db:3c4b with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-388e4d2df3cmr2192735f8f.10.1734519995037; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 03:06:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from phenom.ffwll.local ([2a02:168:57f4:0:5485:d4b2:c087:b497]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-388c80120dcsm14048491f8f.8.2024.12.18.03.06.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 18 Dec 2024 03:06:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 12:06:32 +0100 From: Simona Vetter To: Jens Wiklander Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Olivier Masse , Thierry Reding , Yong Wu , Sumit Semwal , Benjamin Gaignard , Brian Starkey , John Stultz , "T . J . Mercier" , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , Sumit Garg , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , azarrabi@qti.qualcomm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] TEE subsystem for restricted dma-buf allocations Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Jens Wiklander , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Olivier Masse , Thierry Reding , Yong Wu , Sumit Semwal , Benjamin Gaignard , Brian Starkey , John Stultz , "T . J . Mercier" , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , Sumit Garg , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , azarrabi@qti.qualcomm.com References: <20241217100809.3962439-1-jens.wiklander@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241217100809.3962439-1-jens.wiklander@linaro.org> X-Operating-System: Linux phenom 6.12.3-amd64 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241218_030637_533704_2F2D616B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 39.67 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 11:07:36AM +0100, Jens Wiklander wrote: > Hi, > > This patch set allocates the restricted DMA-bufs via the TEE subsystem. > > The TEE subsystem handles the DMA-buf allocations since it is the TEE > (OP-TEE, AMD-TEE, TS-TEE, or perhaps a future QCOMTEE) which sets up the > restrictions for the memory used for the DMA-bufs. > > I've added a new IOCTL, TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_ALLOC, to allocate the restricted > DMA-bufs. This IOCTL reaches the backend TEE driver, allowing it to choose > how to allocate the restricted physical memory. > > TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_ALLOC takes in addition to a size and flags parameters also > a use-case parameter. This is used by the backend TEE driver to decide on > allocation policy and which devices should be able to access the memory. > > Three use-cases (Secure Video Playback, Trusted UI, and Secure Video > Recording) has been identified so far to serve as examples of what can be > expected. More use-cases can be added in userspace ABI, but it's up to the > backend TEE drivers to provide the implementation. > > Each use-case has it's own restricted memory pool since different use-cases > requires isolation from different parts of the system. A restricted memory > pool can be based on a static carveout instantiated while probing the TEE > backend driver, or dynamically allocated from CMA and made restricted as > needed by the TEE. > > This can be tested on QEMU with the following steps: > repo init -u https://github.com/jenswi-linaro/manifest.git -m qemu_v8.xml \ > -b prototype/sdp-v4 > repo sync -j8 > cd build > make toolchains -j$(nproc) > make SPMC_AT_EL=1 all -j$(nproc) > make SPMC_AT_EL=1 run-only > # login and at the prompt: > xtest --sdp-basic > > The SPMC_AT_EL=1 parameter configures the build with FF-A and an SPMC at > S-EL1 inside OP-TEE. The parameter can be changed into SPMC_AT_EL=n to test > without FF-A using the original SMC ABI instead. Please remember to do > %rm -rf ../trusted-firmware-a/build/qemu > for TF-A to be rebuilt properly using the new configuration. > > https://optee.readthedocs.io/en/latest/building/prerequisites.html > list dependencies needed to build the above. > > The tests are pretty basic, mostly checking that a Trusted Application in > the secure world can access and manipulate the memory. There are also some > negative tests for out of bounds buffers etc. I think I've dropped this on earlier encrypted dma-buf discussions for TEE, but can't find one right now ... Do we have some open source userspace for this? To my knowledge we have two implementations of encrypted/content protected dma-buf in upstream right now in the amd and intel gpu drivers, and unless I'm mistaken they both have some minimal userspace supporting EXT_protected_textures: https://github.com/KhronosGroup/OpenGL-Registry/blob/main/extensions/EXT/EXT_protected_textures.txt It's not great, but it does just barely clear the bar in my opinion. I guess something in gstreamer or similar video pipeline framework would also do the job. Especially with the context of the uapi discussion in the v1/RFC thread I think we need more than a bare-bones testcase to make sure this works in actual use. Cheers, Sima > > Thanks, > Jens > > Changes since V3: > * Make the use_case and flags field in struct tee_shm u32's instead of > u16's > * Add more description for TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_ALLOC in the header file > * Import namespace DMA_BUF in module tee, reported by lkp@intel.com > * Added a note in the commit message for "optee: account for direction > while converting parameters" why it's needed > * Factor out dynamic restricted memory allocation from > "optee: support restricted memory allocation" into two new commits > "optee: FF-A: dynamic restricted memory allocation" and > "optee: smc abi: dynamic restricted memory allocation" > * Guard CMA usage with #ifdef CONFIG_CMA, effectively disabling dynamic > restricted memory allocate if CMA isn't configured > > Changes since the V2 RFC: > * Based on v6.12 > * Replaced the flags for SVP and Trusted UID memory with a u32 field with > unique id for each use case > * Added dynamic allocation of restricted memory pools > * Added OP-TEE ABI both with and without FF-A for dynamic restricted memory > * Added support for FF-A with FFA_LEND > > Changes since the V1 RFC: > * Based on v6.11 > * Complete rewrite, replacing the restricted heap with TEE_IOC_RSTMEM_ALLOC > > Changes since Olivier's post [2]: > * Based on Yong Wu's post [1] where much of dma-buf handling is done in > the generic restricted heap > * Simplifications and cleanup > * New commit message for "dma-buf: heaps: add Linaro restricted dmabuf heap > support" > * Replaced the word "secure" with "restricted" where applicable > > Jens Wiklander (6): > tee: add restricted memory allocation > optee: account for direction while converting parameters > optee: sync secure world ABI headers > optee: support restricted memory allocation > optee: FF-A: dynamic restricted memory allocation > optee: smc abi: dynamic restricted memory allocation > > drivers/tee/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/tee/optee/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/tee/optee/call.c | 10 +- > drivers/tee/optee/core.c | 1 + > drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c | 178 +++++++++++++- > drivers/tee/optee/optee_ffa.h | 27 ++- > drivers/tee/optee/optee_msg.h | 65 ++++- > drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h | 75 ++++-- > drivers/tee/optee/optee_smc.h | 71 +++++- > drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c | 31 ++- > drivers/tee/optee/rstmem.c | 388 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c | 213 ++++++++++++++-- > drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 38 ++- > drivers/tee/tee_private.h | 2 + > drivers/tee/tee_rstmem.c | 201 ++++++++++++++++ > drivers/tee/tee_shm.c | 2 + > drivers/tee/tee_shm_pool.c | 69 +++++- > include/linux/tee_core.h | 15 ++ > include/linux/tee_drv.h | 2 + > include/uapi/linux/tee.h | 44 +++- > 20 files changed, 1358 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/tee/optee/rstmem.c > create mode 100644 drivers/tee/tee_rstmem.c > > > base-commit: fac04efc5c793dccbd07e2d59af9f90b7fc0dca4 > -- > 2.43.0 > -- Simona Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch