From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF1FBC02182 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 11:45:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=EaigDTFkUsGG9WvfbjVc7o48sQCAgofbGaOQ+5e6gZY=; b=yGJBuwxxDJYsTcNGgLKkM+GkFh 8ae6JYGekjAsYyeOmHxU8lSHYXrshIcYfsJScTkX9lZdp8I+aVpSdMZVizvqttakgUHLTM9oVsWEM CH1EVNY/O6MRJ1DfSr+Fo7LKrMZfcGOc+7o4qoz4q7fCJwok2NBrWhcf7Hgjd1vSxtM3ER1Vg+e56 9VrS4nX1d4mdXuwHnmZcR3ynXr2qZla9coG7i6qZfYX08grFRePZKRULCxR6QQ0aybZtPRMbVEz6E QDuLX8mFHndyVXXxVavPAtZdSwV/P6OAFaK4qNDA8UOPrE41Krw6aLNJjSznmhSri+ivtqQ33nO20 ZIMx1LOA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1taZB5-0000000A58d-2jNU; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 11:45:47 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1taZ9l-0000000A4wD-0ENa for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 11:44:26 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD551007; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 03:44:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from bogus (e133711.arm.com [10.1.196.55]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7EF153F66E; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 03:44:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 11:44:19 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Vincent Guittot , Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , Sudeep Holla , Bill Mills , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] firmware: arm_ffa: Allow multiple UUIDs per partition Message-ID: References: <0bc7e1754db0547c6c041ed178cf24ca326af2d1.1737522729.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250122_034425_135456_9197E808 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.48 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 10:53:43AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > A partition can implement multiple UUIDs and adding the same partition > twice will fail. Don't try to add a partition again, if it is already > added earlier. > Bertrand shared similar patch and that raised question if we need to support sched_callback from different drivers or not. I need to think if we can drop the whole support of allowing FF-A drivers to register sched_callback or do this properly. Let me think. But this can be a temporary fix though. -- Regards, Sudeep