From: Peilin Ye <yepeilin@google.com>
To: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
bpf@ietf.org, Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>,
David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>, Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com>,
Neel Natu <neelnatu@google.com>,
Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/8] selftests/bpf: Add selftests for load-acquire and store-release instructions
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 00:30:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6Ffquq8IORjCqrI@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <131a817f7f2749e78e527a251ca7971588cf62f8.camel@gmail.com>
Hi Eduard,
One more question (for my understanding):
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 05:06:03PM -0800, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> On Sat, 2025-01-25 at 02:19 +0000, Peilin Ye wrote:
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/arena_atomics.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/arena_atomics.c
> [...]
>
> > +SEC("raw_tp/sys_enter")
> > +int load_acquire(const void *ctx)
> > +{
> > + if (pid != (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32))
> > + return 0;
>
> Nit: This check is not needed, since bpf_prog_test_run_opts() is used
> to run the tests.
Could you explain a bit more why it's not needed?
I read commit 0f4feacc9155 ("selftests/bpf: Adding pid filtering for
atomics test") which added those 'pid' checks to atomics/ tests. The
commit message [1] says the purpose was to "make atomics test able to
run in parallel with other tests", which I couldn't understand.
How using bpf_prog_test_run_opts() makes those 'pid' checks unnecessary?
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211006185619.364369-11-fallentree@fb.com/#r
Thanks,
Peilin Ye
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-04 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-25 2:16 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/8] Introduce load-acquire and store-release BPF instructions Peilin Ye
2025-01-25 2:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/8] bpf/verifier: Factor out atomic_ptr_type_ok() Peilin Ye
2025-01-25 2:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/8] bpf/verifier: Factor out check_atomic_rmw() Peilin Ye
2025-01-25 2:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/8] bpf: Introduce load-acquire and store-release instructions Peilin Ye
2025-01-29 0:19 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-01-29 22:04 ` Peilin Ye
2025-01-29 22:42 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-01-30 3:10 ` Peilin Ye
2025-01-29 1:30 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-01-29 22:17 ` Peilin Ye
2025-01-30 0:41 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-01-30 3:38 ` Peilin Ye
2025-01-25 2:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/8] arm64: insn: Add BIT(23) to {load,store}_ex's mask Peilin Ye
2025-01-25 2:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/8] arm64: insn: Add load-acquire and store-release instructions Peilin Ye
2025-01-25 2:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/8] bpf, arm64: Support " Peilin Ye
2025-01-25 2:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/8] selftests/bpf: Add selftests for " Peilin Ye
2025-01-29 1:06 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-01-29 2:07 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-01-29 2:17 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-01-30 0:03 ` Peilin Ye
2025-02-04 0:30 ` Peilin Ye [this message]
2025-02-04 0:52 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-02-04 1:29 ` Peilin Ye
2025-01-25 2:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 8/8] bpf, docs: Update instruction-set.rst " Peilin Ye
2025-01-30 0:44 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-01-30 7:33 ` Peilin Ye
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z6Ffquq8IORjCqrI@google.com \
--to=yepeilin@google.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@ietf.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brho@google.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=neelnatu@google.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=qmo@kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).