linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peilin Ye <yepeilin@google.com>
To: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	bpf@ietf.org, Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>,
	David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>,
	Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>, Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com>,
	Neel Natu <neelnatu@google.com>,
	Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/8] selftests/bpf: Add selftests for load-acquire and store-release instructions
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 00:30:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6Ffquq8IORjCqrI@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <131a817f7f2749e78e527a251ca7971588cf62f8.camel@gmail.com>

Hi Eduard,

One more question (for my understanding):

On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 05:06:03PM -0800, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> On Sat, 2025-01-25 at 02:19 +0000, Peilin Ye wrote:
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/arena_atomics.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/arena_atomics.c
> [...]
> 
> > +SEC("raw_tp/sys_enter")
> > +int load_acquire(const void *ctx)
> > +{
> > +	if (pid != (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32))
> > +		return 0;
> 
> Nit: This check is not needed, since bpf_prog_test_run_opts() is used
>      to run the tests.

Could you explain a bit more why it's not needed?

I read commit 0f4feacc9155 ("selftests/bpf: Adding pid filtering for
atomics test") which added those 'pid' checks to atomics/ tests.  The
commit message [1] says the purpose was to "make atomics test able to
run in parallel with other tests", which I couldn't understand.

How using bpf_prog_test_run_opts() makes those 'pid' checks unnecessary?

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211006185619.364369-11-fallentree@fb.com/#r

Thanks,
Peilin Ye



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-04  0:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-25  2:16 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/8] Introduce load-acquire and store-release BPF instructions Peilin Ye
2025-01-25  2:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/8] bpf/verifier: Factor out atomic_ptr_type_ok() Peilin Ye
2025-01-25  2:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/8] bpf/verifier: Factor out check_atomic_rmw() Peilin Ye
2025-01-25  2:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/8] bpf: Introduce load-acquire and store-release instructions Peilin Ye
2025-01-29  0:19   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-01-29 22:04     ` Peilin Ye
2025-01-29 22:42       ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-01-30  3:10         ` Peilin Ye
2025-01-29  1:30   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-01-29 22:17     ` Peilin Ye
2025-01-30  0:41   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-01-30  3:38     ` Peilin Ye
2025-01-25  2:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/8] arm64: insn: Add BIT(23) to {load,store}_ex's mask Peilin Ye
2025-01-25  2:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/8] arm64: insn: Add load-acquire and store-release instructions Peilin Ye
2025-01-25  2:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/8] bpf, arm64: Support " Peilin Ye
2025-01-25  2:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/8] selftests/bpf: Add selftests for " Peilin Ye
2025-01-29  1:06   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-01-29  2:07     ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-01-29  2:17       ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-01-30  0:03     ` Peilin Ye
2025-02-04  0:30     ` Peilin Ye [this message]
2025-02-04  0:52       ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-02-04  1:29         ` Peilin Ye
2025-01-25  2:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 8/8] bpf, docs: Update instruction-set.rst " Peilin Ye
2025-01-30  0:44   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-01-30  7:33     ` Peilin Ye

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z6Ffquq8IORjCqrI@google.com \
    --to=yepeilin@google.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@ietf.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brho@google.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=joshdon@google.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=neelnatu@google.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=qmo@kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).