linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, maz@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	eric.auger@redhat.com, sebott@redhat.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	wangzhou1@hisilicon.com, jiangkunkun@huawei.com,
	jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, anthony.jebson@huawei.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] KVM: arm64: Report all the KVM/arm64-specific hypercalls
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 10:24:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6ZPyKK7HLHTtxYu@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z6ZPDml0JKuSjLIO@linux.dev>

On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 10:21:13AM -0800, Oliver Upton wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 01:22:21PM +0000, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > Currently ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_FEATURES_FUNC_ID returns the
> > bitmap corresponding to KVM_REG_ARM_VENDOR_HYP_BMAP and it only
> > returns _KVM_FEATURES_FUNC_ID and _KVM_PTP_FUNC_ID. Change that
> > to return all the KVM/arm64-specific hypercalls exposed by
> > KVM/arm64 to guest operating systems.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c | 6 +++++-
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
> > index 27ce4cb44904..5cef2590ffdf 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
> > @@ -359,7 +359,11 @@ int kvm_smccc_call_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  		val[3] = ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_KVM_REG_3;
> >  		break;
> >  	case ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_FEATURES_FUNC_ID:
> > -		val[0] = smccc_feat->vendor_hyp_bmap;
> > +		val[0] = GENMASK(ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_PTP,
> > +				 ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_FEATURES);
> > +		/* Function numbers 2-63 are reserved for pKVM for now */
> > +		val[2] = GENMASK((ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_DISCOVER_IMPL_CPUS - 64),
> > +				 (ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_DISCOVER_IMPL_VER - 64));
> >  		break;
> 
> This isn't right, vendor_hyp_bmap is very much load bearing. We have a
> documented UAPI that allows userspace to control the hypercalls exposed
> to the guest.
> 
> The idea being a user wants kernel rollback safety and doesn't expose
> hypercalls that could potentially be revoked.
> 
> https://docs.kernel.org/virt/kvm/arm/fw-pseudo-registers.html#bitmap-feature-firmware-registers

To add:

KVM cannot advertise the DISCOVER_IMPL* stuff unconditionally, since the
expectation is that userspace implements these hypercalls. These bits
may need to be writable from userspace but have a reset value of 0.

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-07 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-05 13:22 [PATCH v6 0/4] KVM: arm64: Errata management for VM Live migration Shameer Kolothum
2025-02-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] arm64: Modify _midr_range() functions to read MIDR/REVIDR internally Shameer Kolothum
2025-02-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] KVM: arm64: Introduce hypercall support for retrieving target implementations Shameer Kolothum
2025-02-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] KVM: arm64: Report all the KVM/arm64-specific hypercalls Shameer Kolothum
2025-02-07 18:21   ` Oliver Upton
2025-02-07 18:24     ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2025-02-10 10:36       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2025-02-10 18:57         ` Oliver Upton
2025-02-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] arm64: paravirt: Enable errata based on implementation CPUs Shameer Kolothum
2025-02-07 14:08   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-02-07 14:31     ` Marc Zyngier
2025-02-07 18:10       ` Catalin Marinas
2025-02-07 18:17         ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z6ZPyKK7HLHTtxYu@linux.dev \
    --to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=anthony.jebson@huawei.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=jiangkunkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=sebott@redhat.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).