From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, maz@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
eric.auger@redhat.com, sebott@redhat.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
wangzhou1@hisilicon.com, jiangkunkun@huawei.com,
jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, anthony.jebson@huawei.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] KVM: arm64: Report all the KVM/arm64-specific hypercalls
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 10:24:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6ZPyKK7HLHTtxYu@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z6ZPDml0JKuSjLIO@linux.dev>
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 10:21:13AM -0800, Oliver Upton wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 01:22:21PM +0000, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > Currently ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_FEATURES_FUNC_ID returns the
> > bitmap corresponding to KVM_REG_ARM_VENDOR_HYP_BMAP and it only
> > returns _KVM_FEATURES_FUNC_ID and _KVM_PTP_FUNC_ID. Change that
> > to return all the KVM/arm64-specific hypercalls exposed by
> > KVM/arm64 to guest operating systems.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c | 6 +++++-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
> > index 27ce4cb44904..5cef2590ffdf 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hypercalls.c
> > @@ -359,7 +359,11 @@ int kvm_smccc_call_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > val[3] = ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_KVM_REG_3;
> > break;
> > case ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_FEATURES_FUNC_ID:
> > - val[0] = smccc_feat->vendor_hyp_bmap;
> > + val[0] = GENMASK(ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_PTP,
> > + ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_FEATURES);
> > + /* Function numbers 2-63 are reserved for pKVM for now */
> > + val[2] = GENMASK((ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_DISCOVER_IMPL_CPUS - 64),
> > + (ARM_SMCCC_KVM_FUNC_DISCOVER_IMPL_VER - 64));
> > break;
>
> This isn't right, vendor_hyp_bmap is very much load bearing. We have a
> documented UAPI that allows userspace to control the hypercalls exposed
> to the guest.
>
> The idea being a user wants kernel rollback safety and doesn't expose
> hypercalls that could potentially be revoked.
>
> https://docs.kernel.org/virt/kvm/arm/fw-pseudo-registers.html#bitmap-feature-firmware-registers
To add:
KVM cannot advertise the DISCOVER_IMPL* stuff unconditionally, since the
expectation is that userspace implements these hypercalls. These bits
may need to be writable from userspace but have a reset value of 0.
--
Thanks,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-07 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-05 13:22 [PATCH v6 0/4] KVM: arm64: Errata management for VM Live migration Shameer Kolothum
2025-02-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] arm64: Modify _midr_range() functions to read MIDR/REVIDR internally Shameer Kolothum
2025-02-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] KVM: arm64: Introduce hypercall support for retrieving target implementations Shameer Kolothum
2025-02-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] KVM: arm64: Report all the KVM/arm64-specific hypercalls Shameer Kolothum
2025-02-07 18:21 ` Oliver Upton
2025-02-07 18:24 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2025-02-10 10:36 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2025-02-10 18:57 ` Oliver Upton
2025-02-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] arm64: paravirt: Enable errata based on implementation CPUs Shameer Kolothum
2025-02-07 14:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-02-07 14:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-02-07 18:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-02-07 18:17 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z6ZPyKK7HLHTtxYu@linux.dev \
--to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=anthony.jebson@huawei.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=jiangkunkun@huawei.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=sebott@redhat.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).